These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3987516)

  • 1. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
    Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aluminium in Finn chambers reacts with cobalt and nickel salts in patch test materials.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Apr; 12(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 4017568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?
    Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 17627666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing.
    Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17441852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Absence of interaction between thiomersal and aluminum occlusion chambers].
    Assier-Bonnet H; Slimani S; Revuz J
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2001 Oct; 128(10 Pt 1):1025-6. PubMed ID: 11907962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
    Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three different techniques for application of water solutions to Finn Chambers®.
    Frick-Engfeldt M; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M; Hauksson I; Pontén A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 20946457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misleading patch test results with aluminum Finn chambers and mercury salts.
    Kalveram KJ; Rapp-Frick C; Sorck G
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Dec; 6(7):507-8. PubMed ID: 7214903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
    Suneja T; Belsito DV
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patch testing with aluminium Finn Chambers could give false-positive reactions in patients with contact allergy to aluminium.
    Rosholm Comstedt L; Dahlin J; Bruze M; Hedberg Y; Matura M; Svedman C
    Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Oct; 85(4):407-414. PubMed ID: 33896001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishing aluminium contact allergy.
    Siemund I; Zimerson E; Hindsén M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Sep; 67(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 22594839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Finn chamber methylene blue ring.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Jan; 12(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3979040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Multicenter survey related to the frequency of positive patch tests with mercury and thiomersal].
    Lachapelle JM; Chabeau G; Ducombs G; Lacroix M; Martin P; Reuter G; Marot L
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1988; 115(8):793-6. PubMed ID: 2974266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stability of fragrance patch test preparations applied in test chambers.
    Mowitz M; Zimerson E; Svedman C; Bruze M
    Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):822-7. PubMed ID: 22803625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of aluminium release from Finn chambers under different in vitro test conditions of relevance for patch testing.
    Hedberg YS; Wei Z; Matura M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Nov; 83(5):380-386. PubMed ID: 32484247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audit of Finn Chamber patch test preparation.
    Moffitt DL; Sharp LA; Sansom JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Dec; 47(6):334-6. PubMed ID: 12581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Allergic contact dermatitis from iodine preparations: a conundrum.
    Lee SK; Zhai H; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 15859989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patch testing with hexavalent chromium salts in different vehicles and with nickel and cobalt in petrolatum.
    Samsoen M; Stampf JL; Lelièvre G; Foussereau J
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1982; 30(6):181-4. PubMed ID: 6218976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finn chamber patch test technique.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 6499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vehicle role of petrolatum. Absorption studies with metallic test compounds in guinea pigs.
    Wahlberg JE
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1971; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 4101043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.