BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3987516)

  • 1. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
    Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aluminium in Finn chambers reacts with cobalt and nickel salts in patch test materials.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Apr; 12(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 4017568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?
    Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 17627666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing.
    Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17441852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Absence of interaction between thiomersal and aluminum occlusion chambers].
    Assier-Bonnet H; Slimani S; Revuz J
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2001 Oct; 128(10 Pt 1):1025-6. PubMed ID: 11907962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
    Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three different techniques for application of water solutions to Finn Chambers®.
    Frick-Engfeldt M; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M; Hauksson I; Pontén A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 20946457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misleading patch test results with aluminum Finn chambers and mercury salts.
    Kalveram KJ; Rapp-Frick C; Sorck G
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Dec; 6(7):507-8. PubMed ID: 7214903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
    Suneja T; Belsito DV
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patch testing with aluminium Finn Chambers could give false-positive reactions in patients with contact allergy to aluminium.
    Rosholm Comstedt L; Dahlin J; Bruze M; Hedberg Y; Matura M; Svedman C
    Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Oct; 85(4):407-414. PubMed ID: 33896001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishing aluminium contact allergy.
    Siemund I; Zimerson E; Hindsén M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Sep; 67(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 22594839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Finn chamber methylene blue ring.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Jan; 12(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3979040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Multicenter survey related to the frequency of positive patch tests with mercury and thiomersal].
    Lachapelle JM; Chabeau G; Ducombs G; Lacroix M; Martin P; Reuter G; Marot L
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1988; 115(8):793-6. PubMed ID: 2974266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stability of fragrance patch test preparations applied in test chambers.
    Mowitz M; Zimerson E; Svedman C; Bruze M
    Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):822-7. PubMed ID: 22803625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of aluminium release from Finn chambers under different in vitro test conditions of relevance for patch testing.
    Hedberg YS; Wei Z; Matura M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Nov; 83(5):380-386. PubMed ID: 32484247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audit of Finn Chamber patch test preparation.
    Moffitt DL; Sharp LA; Sansom JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Dec; 47(6):334-6. PubMed ID: 12581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Allergic contact dermatitis from iodine preparations: a conundrum.
    Lee SK; Zhai H; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 15859989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patch testing with hexavalent chromium salts in different vehicles and with nickel and cobalt in petrolatum.
    Samsoen M; Stampf JL; Lelièvre G; Foussereau J
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1982; 30(6):181-4. PubMed ID: 6218976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finn chamber patch test technique.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 6499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vehicle role of petrolatum. Absorption studies with metallic test compounds in guinea pigs.
    Wahlberg JE
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1971; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 4101043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.