These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3987519)

  • 1. [Predictive experimental animal test of contact allergenicity. Relevance of the methods of the OECD and EEC guidelines. The organization for Economic Co-operation and Development].
    Maurer T; Hess R; Weirich EG
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 3987519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The optimization test in the guinea-pig. A method for the predictive evaluation of the contact allergenicity of chemicals.
    Maurer T; Thomann P; Weirich EG; Hess R
    Agents Actions; 1975 May; 5(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 1155304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The optimization test in the guinea pig in relation to other predictive sensitization methods.
    Maurer T; Weirich EG; Hess R
    Toxicology; 1980; 15(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 7466830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of the sensitivity of the 3-induction and 9-induction Buehler test procedures for assessing skin sensitisation potential.
    Botham P; Urtizberea M; Wiemann C; Manciaux X; Tilbury L; Vohr HW; Allen S; Carmichael NG; de Jouffrey S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15582197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guinea pigs in hypersensitivity testing.
    Maurer T
    Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 17161301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive evaluation in animals of the contact allergenic potential of medically important substances. I. Comparison of different methods of inducing and measuring cutaneous sensitization.
    Maurer T; Thomann P; Weirich EG; Hess R
    Contact Dermatitis; 1978 Dec; 4(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 738037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Freund's Complete Adjuvant Test and the Open Epicutaneous Test. A complementary test procedure for realistic assessment of allergenic potential.
    Klecak G
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1985; 14():152-71. PubMed ID: 4064742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy.
    Frankild S; Vølund A; Wahlberg JE; Andersen KE
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2000; 80(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 11028857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.
    Basketter DA; McFadden JF; Gerberick F; Cockshott A; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19207375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation.
    Basketter DA; Andersen KE; Liden C; Van Loveren H; Boman A; Kimber I; Alanko K; Berggren E
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 15701129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information derived from sensitization test methods: test sensitivity, false positives and false negatives.
    Basketter DA; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jan; 56(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17177701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outline features for chemical induction of delayed hypersensitivity.
    Caldas LQ; Hicks R
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1989; 37(3-4):339-52. PubMed ID: 2639632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment.
    Basketter D; Darlenski R; Fluhr JW
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 18509253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint positive control testing in guinea pig skin sensitization tests. A harmonized approach.
    Wiemann C; Berthold K; Heusener A; Krüger N; Seeberger A; Stropp G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 11846632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact allergy: predictive testing of fragrance ingredients in humans by Draize and Maximization methods.
    Marzulli FN; Maibach HI
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1980; 3(5-6):235-45. PubMed ID: 7441083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guinea pig maximization test assessment of hydrocortisone and tixocortol pivalate.
    Mirshahpanah P; Maibach HI
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 18058310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contact and aeroallergens in adulthood atopic dermatitis.
    Pónyai G; Hidvégi B; Németh I; Sas A; Temesvári E; Kárpáti S
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2008 Nov; 22(11):1346-55. PubMed ID: 18680530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.