These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3989103)

  • 1. Changes in the 2f1-f2 acoustic emission and whole-nerve response following sound exposure: long-term effects.
    Dolan TG; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1475-83. PubMed ID: 3989103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term effects of sound exposure on the 2f1-f2 acoustic emission.
    Dolan TG; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1614-6. PubMed ID: 3989113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.
    Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):297-317. PubMed ID: 7410234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of neural excitation in the guinea pig cochlea using low-frequency acoustic modulation.
    Kroin J; Himelfarb M; Strelioff D
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1980; 88(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 7393607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wever and Lawrence revisited: effects of nulling basilar membrane movement on concomitant whole-nerve action potential.
    Offut G
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 3610990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve.
    Fahey PF; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 3973231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An empirical evaluation of the effects of high-pass noise on the whole-nerve action potential.
    Gorga MP; Abbas PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 25(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 7176620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory nerve rate-level functions for two-tone stimuli: possible relation to basilar membrane nonlinearity.
    Sokolowski BH; Sachs MB; Goldstein JL
    Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 41(2-3):115-23. PubMed ID: 2808144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle.
    Crawford AC; Fettiplace R
    J Physiol; 1980 Sep; 306():79-125. PubMed ID: 7463380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion generated by the ear: its emergence and evolution during development.
    Tubach M; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    Laryngoscope; 1996 Jul; 106(7):822-30. PubMed ID: 8667976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of the combination tone 2f1-f2 using two-tone forward masking and compound action potential responses.
    Norris CH; Johnstone BM
    Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 15(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 6501115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medial efferent effects on auditory-nerve responses to tail-frequency tones. I. Rate reduction.
    Stankovic KM; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):857-69. PubMed ID: 10462791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coherence of frequency modulation is encoded by cochlear-generated distortion.
    McAnally KI; Calford MB
    Hear Res; 1992 Mar; 58(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 1568943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emissions in the rat.
    Lenoir M; Puel JL
    Hear Res; 1987; 29(2-3):265-71. PubMed ID: 3624087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation of the whole-nerve action potential off-effect in response to tone bursts.
    Grandori F
    Audiology; 1979; 18(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 373733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes of acoustic nerve and cochlear nucleus evoked potentials due to repetitive stimulation.
    Huang CM; Buchwald JS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Jul; 49(1-2):15-22. PubMed ID: 6159156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basilar membrane tonotopicity in the hook region of the cat cochlea.
    Cooper NP; Rhode WS
    Hear Res; 1992 Nov; 63(1-2):191-6. PubMed ID: 1464570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.