These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3989110)

  • 1. Auditory contrast and speaker quality variation in vowel perception.
    Fox RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1552-9. PubMed ID: 3989110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The direct and indirect roles of fundamental frequency in vowel perception.
    Barreda S; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):466-77. PubMed ID: 22280608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of vocal effort and distance from the speaker on the basis of vowel utterances.
    Eriksson A; Traunmüller H
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jan; 64(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 11916296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic information in the identification and discrimination of vowels.
    Fox RA
    Phonetica; 1989; 46(1-3):97-116. PubMed ID: 2608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua.
    Simon HJ; Studdert-Kennedy M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Nov; 64(5):1338-57. PubMed ID: 744835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-attentive categorization of vowel formant structure in complex tones.
    Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Sussman E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 15268924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.
    Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2088-113. PubMed ID: 2659638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Missing-data model of vowel identification.
    de Cheveigné A; Kawahara H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3497-508. PubMed ID: 10380672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing.
    Sawusch JR; Jusczyk P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Apr; 7(2):408-21. PubMed ID: 6453933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 6():62. PubMed ID: 16225699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels.
    Johnson K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):642-54. PubMed ID: 2212287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aging and the influence of contextual contrast on vowel identification.
    Fox RA; McCracken L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Dec; 69(3 Pt 2):1163-70. PubMed ID: 2622730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between fundamental and formant frequencies in voice preference.
    Assmann PF; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):EL35-43. PubMed ID: 17672527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolving theories of vowel perception.
    Strange W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2081-7. PubMed ID: 2659637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis.
    Vanheusden FJ; Bell SL; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 29757799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination.
    Kewley-Port D; Li X; Zheng Y; Neel AT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2462-70. PubMed ID: 8865651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptation of neuromagnetic N1 responses to phonetic stimuli by visual speech in humans.
    Jääskeläinen IP; Ojanen V; Ahveninen J; Auranen T; Levänen S; Möttönen R; Tarnanen I; Sams M
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2741-4. PubMed ID: 15597045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers.
    Miller RL; Schilling JR; Franck KR; Young ED
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3602-16. PubMed ID: 9193048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.