These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3989110)

  • 21. Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels.
    Liénard JS; Di Benedetto MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):411-22. PubMed ID: 10420631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels.
    Syrdal AK; Gopal HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1086-100. PubMed ID: 3700864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour.
    Hillenbrand JM; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3509-23. PubMed ID: 10380673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.
    Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1412-26. PubMed ID: 2229676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relative contributions of speaking fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to gender identification based on isolated vowels.
    Gelfer MP; Mikos VA
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):544-54. PubMed ID: 16301101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences between spectral dependencies in auditory and phonetic temporal processing: Relevance to the perception of voicing in initial stops.
    Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 7108043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differential effects of speaker and vowel variability on fricative perception.
    Johnson K
    Lang Speech; 1991; 34 ( Pt 3)():265-79. PubMed ID: 1843527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of speaking rate and contrastive stress on formant dynamics and vowel perception.
    Pitermann M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3425-37. PubMed ID: 10875387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perception of vowel-to-vowel transitions with different formant trajectories.
    Carré R; Ainsworth WA; Jospa P; Maeda S; Pasdeloup V
    Phonetica; 2001; 58(3):163-78. PubMed ID: 11423784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Listening to different speakers: on the time-course of perceptual compensation for vocal-tract characteristics.
    Sjerps MJ; Mitterer H; McQueen JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Dec; 49(14):3831-46. PubMed ID: 22001313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attention modulates the use of spectral attributes in vowel discrimination: behavioral and event-related potential evidence.
    Tuomainen J; Savela J; Obleser J; Aaltonen O
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1490():170-83. PubMed ID: 23174416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neurological evidence in support of a specialized phonetic processing module.
    Gokcen JM; Fox RA
    Brain Lang; 2001 Aug; 78(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 11500073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vowel identification: orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic aspects.
    Assmann PF; Nearey TM; Hogan JT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Apr; 71(4):975-89. PubMed ID: 7085986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rate representation and discriminability of second formant frequencies for /epsilon/-like steady-state vowels in cat auditory nerve.
    Conley RA; Keilson SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3223-34. PubMed ID: 8550947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influences of fundamental frequency, formant frequencies, aperiodicity, and spectrum level on the perception of voice gender.
    Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):285-96. PubMed ID: 23882002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neuromagnetic correlates of voice pitch, vowel type, and speaker size in auditory cortex.
    Andermann M; Patterson RD; Vogt C; Winterstetter L; Rupp A
    Neuroimage; 2017 Sep; 158():79-89. PubMed ID: 28669914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.