These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3989462)

  • 1. Eliminating selective stimulus control: a comparison of two procedures for teaching mentally retarded children to respond to compound stimuli.
    Allen KD; Fuqua RW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1985 Feb; 39(1):55-71. PubMed ID: 3989462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using stimulus shaping and fading to establish stimulus control in normal and retarded children.
    Smeets PM; Lancioni GE; Hoogeveen FR
    J Ment Defic Res; 1984 Sep; 28 ( Pt 3)():207-18. PubMed ID: 6492138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of different stimulus manipulations of the acquisition of word recognition in trainable mentally retarded children.
    Smeets PM; Lancioni GE; Hoogeveen FR
    J Ment Defic Res; 1984 Jun; 28 ( Pt 2)():109-22. PubMed ID: 6748056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of static and dynamic presentation procedures on discrimination learning of individuals with severe or moderate mental retardation.
    Karsh KG; Dahlquist CM; Repp AC
    Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(3):167-86. PubMed ID: 7938786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-probability stimulus control topographies with delayed S+ onset in a simultaneous discrimination procedure.
    McIlvane WJ; Kledaras JB; Callahan TC; Dube WV
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Mar; 77(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 11936251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting of letter discrimination by mentally retarded persons.
    Wolfe VF; Cuvo AJ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1978 Nov; 83(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 717444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual discrimination learning in mentally handicapped adults: comparative effects of two-choice and multiple-choice training methods on stimulus generalization performance.
    Griffiths P; Boggan J; Tutt G; Dickens P
    J Ment Defic Res; 1985 Dec; 29 ( Pt 4)():347-57. PubMed ID: 4093962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention to multiple cues by severely mentally retarded adults: effects of single-component pretraining.
    Huguenin NH
    Appl Res Ment Retard; 1985; 6(3):319-35. PubMed ID: 4037790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Programmed training of visual discriminations: a comparison of techniques.
    Strand SC; Morris RC
    Appl Res Ment Retard; 1986; 7(2):165-81. PubMed ID: 3524451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of intraverbal behavior in mentally retarded individuals through transfer of stimulus control procedures: classification of verbal responses.
    Braam SJ; Poling A
    Appl Res Ment Retard; 1983; 4(4):279-302. PubMed ID: 6670867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prompting and stimulus shaping procedures for teaching visual-motor skills to retarded children.
    Mosk MD; Bucher B
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1984; 17(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 6725167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus manipulation versus delayed feedback for teaching missing minuend problems to difficult-to-teach students.
    Smeets PM; Lancioni GE; Striefel S
    Res Dev Disabil; 1987; 8(2):261-82. PubMed ID: 3671813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: the development of generalized skills.
    Saunders KJ; Spradlin JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Nov; 54(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 2103584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination shift learning and response inhibition of moderately and severely mentally retarded and non-retarded children.
    Umetani T; Kitao S; Katada A
    J Ment Defic Res; 1985 Sep; 29 ( Pt 3)():219-24. PubMed ID: 4068034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination training: a comparison of two procedures for presenting multiple examples within a fading and non-fading paradigm.
    van Laarhoven T; Johnson JW; Repp AC; Karsh KG; Lenz M
    Res Dev Disabil; 2003; 24(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 12553964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences.
    de Rose JC; McIlvane WJ; Dube WV; Galpin VC; Stoddard LT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jul; 50(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 3171472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of productive intraverbal behavior through transfer of stimulus control procedures.
    Luciano MC
    Appl Res Ment Retard; 1986; 7(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 3963803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concept learning by retarded children: a comparison of three discrimination learning procedures.
    Aeschleman SR; Higgins AF
    J Ment Defic Res; 1982 Dec; 26 (Pt 4)():229-38. PubMed ID: 7169630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: the effect of training the component simple discriminations.
    Saunders KJ; Spradlin JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jul; 52(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2769172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus equalization: temporary reduction of stimulus complexity to facilitate discrimination learning.
    Hoko JA; LeBlanc JM
    Res Dev Disabil; 1988; 9(3):255-75. PubMed ID: 3175093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.