These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3989786)

  • 21. The Rinne tuning fork test.
    Swan IR
    Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [About the BOEL test].
    Faber E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Oct; 166(41):3624; author reply 3624. PubMed ID: 15515473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [On the underestimation of normal hearing].
    Michel O
    HNO; 2015 May; 63(5):380-2. PubMed ID: 25940009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Examining the validity of the finger rub/finger tap screening test for the early detection of age-related hearing loss].
    Sano T; Morita K; Okuyama Y; Ito N; Osada H
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2018; 65(6):288-299. PubMed ID: 29962448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.
    Miltenburg DM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Testing the hearing level of schoolchildren: comparison of several currently used screening techniques.
    Skurr BA; Jones DL
    Med J Aust; 1981 Sep; 2(5):248-9. PubMed ID: 7300745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity and specificity of Rinne tuning fork test.
    Browning GG; Swan IR
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1381-2. PubMed ID: 3146371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An evaluation of the 'voice test' as a method for assessing hearing in children with particular reference to the situation in developing countries.
    Prescott CA; Omoding SS; Fermor J; Ogilvy D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Dec; 51(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 10628542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maternal knowledge and attitudes to universal newborn hearing screening: Reviewing an established program.
    Lam MYY; Wong ECM; Law CW; Lee HHL; McPherson B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 105():146-153. PubMed ID: 29447803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genetic testing as part of the early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) process.
    Schimmenti LA; Martinez A; Fox M; Crandall B; Shapiro N; Telatar M; Sininger Y; Grody WW; Palmer CG
    Genet Med; 2004; 6(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 15545749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Considerations in clinical application of electrocochleography in 1978.
    Nadol JB
    Laryngoscope; 1979 May; 89(5 Pt 1):698-704. PubMed ID: 449511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Deafness].
    Saint-Guily JL
    Rev Infirm; 1982 Dec; 32(19):21-6. PubMed ID: 6925308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of behavioural tests in early diagnosis of hearing loss.
    Weir CG
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1985; 421():86-92. PubMed ID: 3862333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A sensitive bedside hearing test.
    Arbit E
    Ann Neurol; 1977 Sep; 2(3):250-1. PubMed ID: 617572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests].
    Ziemer C
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The BOEL test--false confidence].
    Ravn SH; Bjerager MO
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Aug; 166(36):3086-8. PubMed ID: 15387306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Response to the Letter to the Editor regarding "A questionnaire-based study on parental satisfaction with a universal newborn hearing screening program in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia".
    Mazlan R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 May; 78(5):891. PubMed ID: 24725649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [National neonatal hearing screening and Central Registry for Hearing Loss in Children].
    Ruev P; Dakov D; Mumdzhiev Kh; Buzalov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(4):56-60. PubMed ID: 15318546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. School hearing screening programme in the UK: practice and performance.
    Fonseca S; Forsyth H; Neary W
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Feb; 90(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 15665168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Results from the Dutch speech-in-noise screening test by telephone.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15692307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.