These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3990259)

  • 1. Some effects of FM-system coupling on hearing aid characteristics.
    Hawkins DB; Schum DJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 3990259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electroacoustic characteristics of personal FM systems.
    Hawkins DB; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 Nov; 47(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 7186576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems.
    Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Nov; 49(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 6503247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
    Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition performance for four combinations of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions.
    Pittman AL; Lewis DE; Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10466564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital signal processing hearing aids, personal FM systems, and interference: is there a problem?
    Bamford J; Hostler M; Pont G
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15937414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 1991; 30(6):330-44. PubMed ID: 1772383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electroacoustic performance characteristics of FM auditory trainers.
    Freeman BA; Sinclair JS; Riggs DE
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 Feb; 45(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 7354626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency response characteristics of FM mini-loop auditory trainers.
    Van Tasell DJ; Landin DP
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 May; 45(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 7442158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency of electroacoustic characteristics across components of FM systems.
    Thibodeau LM; Saucedo KA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):628-35. PubMed ID: 2072687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wind noise in hearing aids: II. Effect of microphone directivity.
    Chung K
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jan; 51(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 22111542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 6887805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of spectral characteristics of wind noise between omnidirectional and directional microphones.
    Chung K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4508-17. PubMed ID: 22712924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency Modulation System and Bone Conduction Hearing Aid: Electroacoustic Verification.
    Paccola ECM; Costa Filho OA; Jacob RTS
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 25(4):e483-e489. PubMed ID: 34737817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of measurements of the characteristics of directional microphone hearing aids in an IAC test room and an anechoic chamber.
    Brey RH; Caustin EI; McPherson JH
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(5):173-81. PubMed ID: 853009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complex and pure-tone signals in the evaluation of hearing-aid characteristics.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Seewald RC; Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 2359278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.