These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3993541)

  • 21. Critique of 1985 ACGIH report on particle size-selective sampling in the workplace.
    Bartley DL; Doemeny LJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Aug; 47(8):443-7. PubMed ID: 3751894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.
    Linnainmaa M; Laitinen J; Leskinen A; Sippula O; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aerosol sampling efficiency of 37 mm filter cassettes.
    Buchan RM; Soderholm SC; Tillery MI
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Dec; 47(12):825-31. PubMed ID: 3593471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Applications of low-cost, dual-fraction dust samplers.
    Kenny L; Chung K; Dilworth M; Hammond C; Wynn Jones J; Shreeve Z; Winton J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 11137697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Field testing of new aerosol sampling method with a porous curved surface as inlet.
    Hauck BC; Grinshpun SA; Reponen A; Reponen T; Willeke K; Bornschein RL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Oct; 58(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 9342831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.
    Kenny LC; Bowry A; Crook B; Stancliffe JD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 10518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of criteria for defining inspirable aerosol and the development of appropriate samplers.
    Vincent JH; Mark D
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 May; 48(5):454-7. PubMed ID: 3591667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Personal exposure to airborne dust and microorganisms in agricultural environments.
    Lee SA; Adhikari A; Grinshpun SA; McKay R; Shukla R; Reponen T
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Mar; 3(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 16484176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Monitoring of urban particulate using an electret-based passive sampler.
    Thorpe A; Hemingway MA; Brown RC
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 Nov; 14(11):750-8. PubMed ID: 10590548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of the GCA respirable dust monitor 101-1.
    Marple VA; Rubow KL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Jan; 39(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 204180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitating the efficiency of the coal mine personal respirable dust sampler for sampling oxide fumes.
    Tomb TF; Beckert AJ; Treaftis HN
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Aug; 37(8):459-63. PubMed ID: 970321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Redesign of a static horizontal elutriator to perform according to the ISO 7708 respirable convention.
    Myojo T; Oyabu T; Kuroda K; Kadoya C; Nishi K; Tanaka I
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jun; 51(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 17456582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A field comparison of the IOM inhalable aerosol sampler and a modified 37-mm cassette.
    Clinkenbeard RE; England EC; Johnson DL; Esmen NA; Hall TA
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Sep; 17(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 12216591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
    Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Equivalency of a personal dust monitor to the current United States coal mine respirable dust sampler.
    Page SJ; Volkwein JC; Vinson RP; Joy GJ; Mischler SE; Tuchman DP; McWilliams LJ
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new approach to sampling for particle size and chemical species "fingerprinting" of workplace aerosols.
    Kerr SM; Vincent JH; Ramachandran G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Oct; 45(7):555-68. PubMed ID: 11583657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new two-stage respirable dust sampler.
    Tomb TF; Treaftis HN
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Jan; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 1111262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Design and laboratory testing of a new flow-through directional passive air sampler for ambient particulate matter.
    Lin C; Solera Garcia MA; Timmis R; Jones KC
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Mar; 13(3):753-61. PubMed ID: 21321740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sampling and interpretation errors in aerosol monitoring.
    Willeke K; Baron PA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Mar; 51(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 2327327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigations into the source of two fungicides measured in the air for 24 hours following application to a cereal crop.
    Ellis MC; Lane AG; O'Sullivan CM; Miller PC
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 20218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.