146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3993628)
1. Laboratory evaluation of the Coulter "three-part electronic differential".
Nelson L; Charache S; Keyser E; Metzger P
Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 May; 83(5):547-54. PubMed ID: 3993628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential as a screening tool in a tertiary care hospital.
Miers MK; Fogo AB; Federspiel CF; McAllister NW; Phillips PA; Cousar JB
Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Jun; 87(6):745-51. PubMed ID: 3591747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of an automated method for leukocyte differential counts based on electronic volume analysis.
Allen JK; Batjer JD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1985 Jun; 109(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 3838883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.
Bhuta UM; Ulstein H
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 14521325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.
Griswold DJ; Champagne VD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Jul; 84(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 4014075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated differential leukocyte counts.
Morse EE; Nashed A; Spilove L
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1989; 19(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 2658725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory evaluation of differential white blood cell count information from the Coulter S-plus IV and Technicon H-1 in patient populations requiring rapid "turnaround" time.
Nelson L; Charache S; Wingfield S; Keyser E
Am J Clin Pathol; 1989 May; 91(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 2718955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of a five-color flow cytometric assay for verifying automated white blood cell differentials.
Huang CM; Yu LH; Pu CW; Wang X; Wang G; Shen LS; Wang JZ; Cui W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Feb; 126(4):716-21. PubMed ID: 23422195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of differential white blood cell counts using manual technic and the Coulter S-Plus IV.
Greendyke RM; Kanter DR; DeBoover L; Savage L; VanGelder S
Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Sep; 84(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 4036866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Mindray BC-5000 hematology analyzer: a new miniature 5-part WBC differential instrument.
Xiang D; Yue J; Lan Y; Sha C; Ren S; Li Y; Li M; Wang C
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Oct; 37(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 25944368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a total hematology analysis system (Sysmex HS-430). Benefits for large laboratories by reducing manual work load and optimizing screening efficacy for pathologic samples.
Födinger M; Speiser W; Karabentcheva S; Scherrer R; Veitl M; Schwarzinger I
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 7572809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variations in pleural fluid WBC count and differential counts with different sample containers and different methods.
Conner BD; Lee YC; Branca P; Rogers JT; Rodriguez RM; Light RW
Chest; 2003 Apr; 123(4):1181-7. PubMed ID: 12684309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliable, accurate determination of the leukocyte differential of leukopenic samples by using Hematoflow method.
Jo Y; Kim SH; Koh K; Park J; Shim YB; Lim J; Kim Y; Park YJ; Han K
Korean J Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 31(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 21779183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Leukocyte differential of the Coulter VCS. Evaluation and modalities of use in comparison with the Coulter STKR and manual count].
Jouault H; Imbert M; Mary JY; Ade P; Herpin J; Sultan C
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1990; 48(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 2360747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation and performance of the Coulter STKS.
Verheul FE; Spitters JM; Bergmans CH
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Mar; 31(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 8490065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First clinical evaluation of the CELL-DYN 3200 haematology analyser.
Sachse C; Jahns-Streubel G; Henkel E
Clin Lab Haematol; 1998 Dec; 20(6):333-40. PubMed ID: 9951577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of automated slidemakers and stainers in a working laboratory environment - routine operation and quality control.
Simson E; Gascon-Lema MG; Brown DL
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 1):e64-76. PubMed ID: 19220552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical evaluation of leukocyte differential count in peripheral blood by five-color flow cytometry].
Xing Y; Wang JZ; Pu CW; Shang K
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 93(30):2392-6. PubMed ID: 24300210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Coulter three-part differential screen.
Ross DW; Watson JS; Davis PH; Tracy SL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 84(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 4036878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
