These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3993734)

  • 21. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve parameters with the modified near mallett unit in symptomatic and asymptomatic university students.
    Momeni Moghadam H; A Goss D; Yekta AA; Ehsani M
    Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2013 Nov; 15(11):e8572. PubMed ID: 24719687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vertical fixation disparity correction: effect on the horizontal forced-vergence fixation disparity curve.
    London RF; Wick B
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Sep; 64(9):653-6. PubMed ID: 3688184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Wesson and modified Sheedy fixation disparity tests. Do fixation disparity measures relate to normal binocular status?
    van Haeringen R; McClurg P; Cameron KD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 3627800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of fixation disparity curves.
    Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D; Dibble C
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 Nov; 58(11):960-4. PubMed ID: 7315947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationship between fixation disparity curves and symptoms in monofixators.
    London R; Wick B
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Nov; 53(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7175062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Horizontal and vertical vergence training and its effect on vergences and fixation disparity curves: I. Horizontal data.
    Daum KM; Rutstein RP; Cho M; Eskridge JB
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Jan; 65(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3348344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The proximity-fixation-disparity curve and the preferred viewing distance at a visual display as an indicator of near vision fatigue.
    Jaschinski W
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 79(3):158-69. PubMed ID: 11913842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
    Brownlee GA; Goss DA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The accommodative contribution to binocular vergence eye movements.
    Hesler J; Pickwell D; Gilchrist J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1989 Oct; 9(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 2631003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Association of symptoms with measures of oculomotor deficiencies.
    Sheedy JE; Saladin JJ
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1978 Oct; 55(10):670-6. PubMed ID: 747192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fixation disparity and accommodation as a function of viewing distance and prism load.
    Jaschinski W
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jul; 17(4):324-39. PubMed ID: 9390377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Horizontal and vertical vergence training and its effect on vergences, fixation disparity curves, and prism adaptation: II. Vertical data.
    Rutstein RP; Daum KM; Cho M; Eskridge JB
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Jan; 65(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 3348354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of volition on the horizontal forced-vergence fixation disparity curve.
    Garzia RP; Nicholson SB
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Jan; 65(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 3348352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uncertainty in the measurement of fixation disparity due to zones of perceived nonius alignment.
    Larson WL
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1982; 219(5):233-5. PubMed ID: 7160631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of two fixation disparity determinantions.
    Reading RW
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Sep; 66(9):612-5. PubMed ID: 2797715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combined effects of spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity upon fixation disparity.
    Schor C; Wesson M; Robertson KM
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Aug; 63(8):619-26. PubMed ID: 3766690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gain changes in the accommodative convergence cross-link.
    Bobier WR; McRae M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Jul; 16(4):318-25. PubMed ID: 8796201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fixation disparity: binocular vergence accuracy for a visual display at different positions relative to the eyes.
    Jainta S; Jaschinski W
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 12502161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Field of vergence limits.
    Sheni DD; Remole A
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Apr; 63(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 3706479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repeatability of Associated Phoria Tests.
    Alhassan M; Hovis JK; Chou RB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):900-7. PubMed ID: 26099058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.