305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3996784)
1. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram.
Gorga MP; Worthington DW; Reiland JK; Beauchaine KA; Goldgar DE
Ear Hear; 1985; 6(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 3996784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distortion product otoacoustic emission and auditory brain stem response measures of pediatric sensorineural hearing loss with islands of normal sensitivity.
Balfour PB; Pillion JP; Gaskin AE
Ear Hear; 1998 Dec; 19(6):463-72. PubMed ID: 9867294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants.
Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency-specific aspects of the auditory brainstem response threshold elicited by 1000-Hz filtered clicks in subjects with sloping cochlear hearing losses.
Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
Audiology; 1993; 32(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8447757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses.
Vander Werff KR; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 15937412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears and in ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Hauser R; Probst R; Löhle E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1991; 248(6):345-52. PubMed ID: 1930984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms I: Electrophysiology.
Prendergast G; Guest H; Munro KJ; Kluk K; Léger A; Hall DA; Heinz MG; Plack CJ
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():68-81. PubMed ID: 27816499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss.
Maloff ES; Hood LJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 24441741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Steady-state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brain stem response.
Rance G; Dowell RC; Rickards FW; Beer DE; Clark GM
Ear Hear; 1998 Feb; 19(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 9504272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ABR thresholds to tonebursts gated with Blackman and linear windows in adults with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Purdy SC; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 12195178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response threshold elicited by clicks masked with 1590-Hz high-pass noise in subjects with sloping cochlear hearing losses.
Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
Audiology; 1992; 31(5):272-83. PubMed ID: 1449430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of sensory hearing loss on cochlear filter times estimated from auditory brainstem response latencies.
Don M; Ponton CW; Eggermont JJ; Kwong B
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2280-9. PubMed ID: 10491692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear processes affecting wave V latency of the auditory evoked brain stem response. A study of patients with sensory hearing loss.
Yamada O; Kodera K; Yagi T
Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 515691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of Click and Swept-Tone Auditory Brainstem Response Results for Moderate and Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Tan J; Luo J; Wang X; Jiang Y; Zeng X; Chen S; Li P
Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(6):336-344. PubMed ID: 32906132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of cochlear hearing loss on auditory brain stem response latency.
Kirsh I; Thornton A; Burkard R; Halpin C
Ear Hear; 1992 Aug; 13(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 1397765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of 1000 Hz tone-burst-evoked responses in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma.
Telian SA; Kileny PR
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Oct; 101(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 2508024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of audiometric configuration on the auditory brain stem response.
Keith WJ; Greville KA
Ear Hear; 1987 Feb; 8(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 3556811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
