These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3998296)
21. A masking level difference due to harmonicity. Treurniet WC; Boucher DR J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):306-20. PubMed ID: 11206159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity. Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27992390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of level and frequency on the audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones. Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Low KE; Cope T; Cope W J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):934-44. PubMed ID: 16938981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Neural correlates of auditory scene analysis based on inharmonicity in monkey primary auditory cortex. Fishman YI; Steinschneider M J Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 30(37):12480-94. PubMed ID: 20844143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Grouping in pitch perception: effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component. Darwin CJ; Ciocca V J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3381-90. PubMed ID: 1619115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch. Cariani PA; Delgutte B J Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 76(3):1717-34. PubMed ID: 8890287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of asynchrony and ear of presentation on the pitch of mistuned partials in harmonic and frequency-shifted complex tones. Brunstrom JM; Roberts B J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):391-401. PubMed ID: 11508964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perception of the low pitch of frequency-shifted complexes. Moore GA; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):977-85. PubMed ID: 12597191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of hearing loss on the resolution of partials and fundamental frequency discrimination. Moore BC; Glasberg BR J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2891-901. PubMed ID: 22087918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of frequency discrimination thresholds for complex and single tones in chinchillas. Shofner WP Hear Res; 2000 Nov; 149(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 11033250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Difference limens for phase in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. Moore BC; Glasberg BR J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1351-65. PubMed ID: 2808909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of duration on the frequency discrimination of individual partials in a complex tone and on the discrimination of fundamental frequency. Gockel HE; Moore BC; Carlyon RP; Plack CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):373-82. PubMed ID: 17297792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: the role of temporal structure and peripheral compression. Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2759-70. PubMed ID: 12083211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity. Moore BC; Peters RW J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2881-93. PubMed ID: 1629481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]