These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3998695)

  • 41. [Psychological diagnosis in the evaluation of mental status of criminal offenders].
    Gordon T; Rutkowski R
    Psychiatr Pol; 1989; 23(5-6):412-7. PubMed ID: 2485476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials.
    Butler B; Moran G
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 17440900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Godinez v. Moran: the U.S. Supreme Court considers competence to stand trial.
    Appelbaum PS
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Oct; 44(10):929-30. PubMed ID: 8225272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Warmth and competence on the witness stand: implications for the credibility of male and female expert witnesses.
    Neal TM; Guadagno RE; Eno CA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):488-97. PubMed ID: 23233470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The death penalty and persons with mental disabilities: a lethal dose of stigma, sanism, fear of violence, and faulty predictions of dangerousness.
    Parry JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2005; 29(5):667-9. PubMed ID: 16379481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The role of the defense psychiatrist in workmen's compensation cases.
    Parlour RR; Jones LR
    J Forensic Sci; 1981 Jul; 26(3):535-42. PubMed ID: 6454760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Psychiatric evidence on the ultimate issue.
    Buchanan A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 16585229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Psychiatrists in the hot seat: discrediting doctors by impeachment of their credibility.
    Goldstein RL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 3179501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The psychiatric expert witness in the criminal justice system.
    Mullen PE
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2010 Jul; 20(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 20549780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Dangerousness prognosis in the clinical context of fulfillment of psychiatric criminal commitment].
    Weber F; Koch U; Leygraf N
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 1996 Aug; 46(8):312-7. PubMed ID: 8927687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility for schizophrenic persons accused of murder: Study with experts of the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2016 Aug; 42(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 26471517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Alternatives in psychiatric testimony on dangerousness.
    Smith JT; English MJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1978 Jul; 23(3):588-95. PubMed ID: 744989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Revisiting the parable: truth without consequences.
    Stone AA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(1):79-97. PubMed ID: 8200726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.
    Gutheil TG
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The problem of evasive testimony: the expert "waffle".
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 17389354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Compliance with psychiatric legal ordinance section 63 STGB. Legal principles--current status--treatment concepts--perspectives].
    Nedopil N; Müller-Isberner R
    Nervenarzt; 1995 Nov; 66(11):793-801. PubMed ID: 8532095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Ethical concerns expressed by forensic psychiatrists.
    Weinstock R
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Apr; 31(2):596-602. PubMed ID: 3711835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Expert testimony in cult-related litigation.
    Young JL; Griffith EE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 2676025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.