These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3998987)

  • 1. Telling ingratiating lies: effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success.
    DePaulo BM; Stone JI; Lassiter GD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1985 May; 48(5):1191-203. PubMed ID: 3998987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lie-detection biases among male police interrogators, prisoners, and laypersons.
    Elaad E
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1047-56. PubMed ID: 20229908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's use of a verbal-nonverbal consistency principle to infer truth and lying.
    Rotenberg KJ; Simourd L; Moore D
    Child Dev; 1989 Apr; 60(2):309-22. PubMed ID: 2924654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is It the Judge, the Sender, or Just the Individual Message? Disentangling Person and Message Effects on Variation in Lie-Detection Judgments.
    Volz S; Reinhard MA; Müller P
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Nov; 18(6):1368-1387. PubMed ID: 36791692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cry me a river: identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception.
    Ten Brinke L; Porter S
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):469-477. PubMed ID: 23205594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motivational cues: the role of perceived senders' self-control ability in raters' deception judgements.
    Wu S; Zou H; Cai W; Wang X; Jin S
    Int J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 49(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 24811883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insincere utterances and gaze: eye contact during sarcastic statements.
    Williams JA; Burns EL; Harmon EA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Apr; 108(2):565-72. PubMed ID: 19544962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lying in everyday life.
    DePaulo BM; Kashy DA; Kirkendol SE; Wyer MM; Epstein JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 May; 70(5):979-95. PubMed ID: 8656340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.
    Vrij A; Hartwig M; Granhag PA
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():295-317. PubMed ID: 30609913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-channel effects of vocal and physical attractiveness and their implications for interpersonal perception.
    Zuckerman M; Miyake K; Hodgins HS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Apr; 60(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 2037966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated decoding of facial expressions reveals marked differences in children when telling antisocial versus prosocial lies.
    Zanette S; Gao X; Brunet M; Bartlett MS; Lee K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():165-179. PubMed ID: 27318957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploiting attractiveness in persuasion: senders' implicit theories about receivers' processing motivation.
    Vogel T; Kutzner F; Fiedler K; Freytag P
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jun; 36(6):830-42. PubMed ID: 20472856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When is Deceptive Message Production More Effortful than Truth-Telling? A Baker's Dozen of Moderators.
    Burgoon JK
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1965. PubMed ID: 26733932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face-to-Face Lying: Gender and Motivation to Deceive.
    Elaad E; Gonen-Gal Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():820923. PubMed ID: 35391990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Encoding and decoding nonverbal cues of emotion.
    Zuckerman M; Lipets MS; Koivumaki JH; Rosenthal R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1975 Dec; 32(6):1068-76. PubMed ID: 1214214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of lying in well-mixed populations.
    Capraro V; Perc M; Vilone D
    J R Soc Interface; 2019 Jul; 16(156):20190211. PubMed ID: 31362620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
    Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who lies?
    Kashy DA; DePaulo BM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 May; 70(5):1037-51. PubMed ID: 8656334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Papa Don't Preach? : Using Lies to Expose the Truth about Who Suppresses Female Sexuality.
    Kellie DJ; Dixson BJW; Brooks RC
    Hum Nat; 2020 Sep; 31(3):222-248. PubMed ID: 32794067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meeting your match: how attractiveness similarity affects approach behavior in mixed-sex dyads.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 19336540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.