These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Hypnosis and the dream hidden observer: primary process and demand characteristics. Maré C; Lynn SJ; Kvaal S; Segal D; Sivec H J Abnorm Psychol; 1994 May; 103(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 8040501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary process, hypnotic dreams, and the hidden observer: hypnosis versus alert imagining. Pinnell CM; Lynn SJ; Pinnell JP Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 9780526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of hypnotists' and subjects' sex on hypnotic susceptibility. D'Eon JL; Mah CD; Pawlak AE; Spanos NP Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1232-4. PubMed ID: 492896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impulsivity, self-control, and hypnotic suggestibility. Ludwig VU; Stelzel C; Krutiak H; Prunkl CE; Steimke R; Paschke LM; Kathmann N; Walter H Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):637-53. PubMed ID: 23660477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hypnotic dreams as a lens into hypnotic dynamics. Raz A; Schweizer HR; Zhu H; Bowles EN Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2010 Jan; 58(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 20183739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hypnotizability, sleepiness, and subjective experience. Móró L; Noreika V; Revonsuo A; Kallio S Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Apr; 59(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21390980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sex differences in dreaming during short propofol sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Xu G; Liu X; Sheng Q; Yu F; Wang K Neuroreport; 2013 Oct; 24(14):797-802. PubMed ID: 23863717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of a confusion technique on hypnotic responsivity in low-susceptible subjects. Stanger T; Tucker CM; Morgan JI Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Jan; 38(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 8712164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The hypnotic dreams of healthy children and children with cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. LeBaron S; Fanurik D; Zeltzer LK Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2001 Oct; 49(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 11596826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct and indirect scales of hypnotic susceptibility: resistance to therapy and psychometric comparability. Robin BR; Kumar VK; Pekala RJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Apr; 53(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 16025732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex differences on the HGSHS:A. Rudski JM; Marra LC; Graham KR Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2004 Jan; 52(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 14768968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dreaming, Mind-Wandering, and Hypnotic Dreams. Fazekas P; Nemeth G Front Neurol; 2020; 11():565673. PubMed ID: 33162928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: accuracy of self-report and the memory for items. Younger J; Kemmerer DD; Winkel JD; Nash MR Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Jul; 53(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 16076667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paired-associate learning and recall of high and low imagery words: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, and visualization abilities. Crawford HJ; Allen SN Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(3):353-72. PubMed ID: 8837407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Personality, hypnotic susceptibility and EEG responses: preliminary study. De Pascalis V; Imperiali MG Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Oct; 59(2):371-8. PubMed ID: 6514486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Owls and larks in hypnosis: individual differences in hypnotic susceptibility relating to biological rhythms. Lippincott B Am J Clin Hypn; 1992 Jan; 34(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 1543148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The hidden observer, hypnotic dreams, and age regression: clinical implications. Lynn SJ; Maré C; Kvaal S; Segal D; Sivec H Am J Clin Hypn; 1994 Oct; 37(2):130-42. PubMed ID: 7992804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]