These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4000862)

  • 1. Information processing abilities and performance on two perceptual-motor tasks.
    Siegel D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 4000862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Act quickly, decide later: long-latency visual processing underlies perceptual decisions but not reflexive behavior.
    Jolij J; Scholte HS; van Gaal S; Hodgson TL; Lamme VA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):3734-45. PubMed ID: 21557644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the role of motor regulation in figural fluency: partialing variance in the Ruff Figural fluency test.
    Kraybill ML; Suchy Y
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Nov; 30(8):903-12. PubMed ID: 18608686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive requirements for vestibular and ocular motor processing in healthy adults and patients with unilateral vestibular lesions.
    Talkowski ME; Redfern MS; Jennings JR; Furman JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1432-41. PubMed ID: 16197696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objects and events as determinants of parallel processing in dual tasks: evidence from the backward compatibility effect.
    Ellenbogen R; Meiran N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):152-67. PubMed ID: 20718573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equivalency of reaction times for simple and primed tasks.
    Hart MA; Reeve TG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 17055991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of performance in simple and choice reaction time tasks between obese and healthy-weight children.
    Gentier I; Augustijn M; Deforche B; Tanghe A; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Lenoir M; D'Hondt E
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2635-41. PubMed ID: 23751303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor-response generation as a source of aging-related behavioural slowing in choice-reaction tasks.
    Kolev V; Falkenstein M; Yordanova J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2006 Nov; 27(11):1719-30. PubMed ID: 16246465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of pallidal deep brain stimulation and levodopa treatment on reaction-time performance in Parkinson's disease.
    Schubert T; Volkmann J; Müller U; Sturm V; Voges J; Freund HJ; Von Cramon DY
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 11976755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contingent muscular tension during a choice reaction task.
    Araki M; Choshi K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Jun; 102(3):736-46. PubMed ID: 16916152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affordance effects in grasping actions for graspable objects: electromyographic reaction time study.
    Suzuki T; Takagi M; Sugawara K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Dec; 115(3):881-90. PubMed ID: 23409599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: a psychophysiological analysis.
    Miller JO; Low K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):266-89. PubMed ID: 11318047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multidimensional vector model of stimulus-response compatibility.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):272-303. PubMed ID: 22229489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Keeping Simon simple: examining the relationship between sequential modulations and feature repetitions with two stimuli, two locations and two responses.
    Hazeltine E; Akçay C; Mordkoff JT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 20708162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
    Leonhard T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Information transmission for one-dimensional stimuli: the role of strategies.
    De Sanctis P; Sommer W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 19268876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excitability of subcortical motor circuits in Go/noGo and forced choice reaction time tasks.
    Kumru H; Urra X; Compta Y; Castellote JM; Turbau J; Valls-Solé J
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(1-2):66-70. PubMed ID: 16904825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task and driving performance of patients with a severe concussion of the brain.
    Stokx LC; Gaillard AW
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1986 Aug; 8(4):421-36. PubMed ID: 3745415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.
    Ohara S; Lenz F; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16324794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms.
    Jiang Y; Kanwisher N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1080-94. PubMed ID: 14709228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.