These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4000906)

  • 1. Computer aided design of prosthetic sockets for below-knee amputees.
    Saunders CG; Foort J; Bannon M; Lean D; Panych L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 4000906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental fittings of sockets for below-knee amputees using computer aided design and manufacturing techniques.
    Foort J; Spiers R; Bannon M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 4000912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shape sensing for computer aided below-knee prosthetic socket design.
    Fernie GR; Griggs G; Bartlett S; Lunau K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 4000905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of computer aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1990 Dec; 14(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 2128892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosthetic shape replication using a computer controlled carving technique.
    Lawrence RB; Knox W; Crawford HV
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 4000907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A CAD CAM method for custom below-knee sockets.
    Engsberg JR; Clynch GS; Lee AG; Allan JS; Harder JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Dec; 16(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 1491952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quantitative method for comparing and evaluating manual prosthetic socket modifications.
    Lemaire ED; Johnson F
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1996 Dec; 4(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 8973956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Rapidform process for automated thermoplastic socket production.
    Davies RM; Lawrence RB; Routledge PE; Knox W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 4000908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An experimental and theoretical framework for manufacturing prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees.
    Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Crawford RH; Rogers WE; Bosker G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 17009490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket.
    Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An open socket technique for through-knee amputations in relation to skin problems of the stump: an explorative study.
    Otter N; Postema K; Rijken RA; van Limbeek J
    Clin Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 13(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 10327095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided socket design for trans-femoral amputees.
    Travis RP; Dewar ME
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 8134277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CAD/CAM evaluation of the fit of trans-tibial sockets for trans-tibial amputation stumps.
    Isozaki K; Hosoda M; Masuda T; Morita S
    J Med Dent Sci; 2006 Mar; 53(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 16722145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Swedish knee-cage for stabilizing short below-knee stumps.
    Isakov E; Mizrahi J; Susak Z; Onna I
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Aug; 16(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 1408669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of CAD-CAM and hand made sockets for PTB prostheses.
    Köhler P; Lindh L; Netz P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Apr; 13(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 2717380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Socket design and manufacturing technique for through-knee stumps.
    Botta P; Baumgartner R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1983 Aug; 7(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 6622226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a quantitative method for defining CAD/CAM socket modifications.
    Lemaire ED; Bexiga P; Johnson F; Solomonidis SE; Paul JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 10355641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences and trends of various shape-capture methods on outcomes in trans-tibial prosthetics: A systematic review.
    Suyi Yang E; Aslani N; McGarry A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):540-555. PubMed ID: 31364475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of the pilot phase of a clinical evaluation of computer aided design of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets.
    Holden JM; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Dec; 10(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 3808920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporary prosthetic fitting for below-knee amputation.
    Ozyalcin H; Sesli E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Aug; 13(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 2780266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.