These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4000910)

  • 21. Prosthetic loading during kneeling of persons with transfemoral amputation.
    Magnissalis EA; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Paul JP; Zahedi S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1999 Jul; 36(3):164-72. PubMed ID: 10659799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parametric optimization and design validation based on finite element analysis of hybrid socket adapter for transfemoral prosthetic knee.
    Kumar N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Oct; 38(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 24286805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The TC double socket above-knee prosthesis.
    Koike K; Ishikura Y; Kakurai S; Imamura T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1981 Dec; 5(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 7329773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transfemoral socket design and suspension options.
    Kapp SL
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):569-83, vi. PubMed ID: 10989479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of inexpensive prosthetic feet for high-heeled shoes using simple shoe insole model.
    Meier MR; Tucker KA; Hansen AH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 25019666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A CAD CAM method for custom below-knee sockets.
    Engsberg JR; Clynch GS; Lee AG; Allan JS; Harder JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Dec; 16(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 1491952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Below knee prosthetic socket designs and suspension systems.
    Edwards ML
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):585-93, vi. PubMed ID: 10989480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Static structural testing of trans-tibial composite sockets.
    Current TA; Kogler GF; Barth DG
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Aug; 23(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 10493138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lower-limb prosthetic technologies in the developing world: A review of literature from 1994-2010.
    Andrysek J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Dec; 34(4):378-98. PubMed ID: 21083505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fatigue testing of energy storing prosthetic feet.
    Toh SL; Goh JC; Tan PH; Tay TE
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 8134278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Principal structural testing of trans-tibial prosthetic assemblies: specimen preparation.
    Neo LD; Lee PV; Goh JC
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2000 Dec; 24(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 11195360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of use and durability of polypropylene trans-tibial prostheses.
    Verhoeff TT; Poetsma PA; Gasser L; Tung H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Dec; 23(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 10890601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative roll-over analysis of prosthetic feet.
    Curtze C; Hof AL; van Keeken HG; Halbertsma JP; Postema K; Otten B
    J Biomech; 2009 Aug; 42(11):1746-53. PubMed ID: 19446814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Design of monolimb using finite element modelling and statistics-based Taguchi method.
    Lee WC; Zhang M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug; 20(7):759-66. PubMed ID: 15963612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical field-testing of ATLAS prosthetic system for trans-tibial amputees.
    Jensen JS; Raab W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Aug; 26(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 12227454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.
    Torburn L; Powers CM; Guiterrez R; Perry J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 May; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 7562650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Self-Heating Mould for Composite Manufacturing.
    Kondratiev A; Píštěk V; Purhina S; Shevtsova M; Fomina A; Kučera P
    Polymers (Basel); 2021 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 34577975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Condition Monitoring of Additively Manufactured Injection Mould Tooling: A Review of Demands, Opportunities and Potential Strategies.
    Weinert A; Tormey D; O'Hara C; McAfee M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of Raised Feature Failures on 3D Printed Injection Moulds.
    Bagalkot A; Pons D; Symons D; Clucas D
    Polymers (Basel); 2021 May; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 34064963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Report on the evaluation of the VA/Seattle below-knee prosthesis.
    Ellepola W; Sheredos SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 8035354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.