These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4001409)

  • 1. Objective assessment of mammography systems. Part I: Method.
    Hessler C; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Pochon Y; Raimondi S; Valley JF
    Radiology; 1985 Jul; 156(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 4001409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective assessment of mammography systems. Part II: Implementation.
    Hessler C; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Pochon Y; Raimondi S; Valley JF
    Radiology; 1985 Jul; 156(1):221-5. PubMed ID: 4001410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of a figure-of-merit (FOM) for optimisation in digital mammography: a literature review.
    Borg M; Badr I; Royle GJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 22232780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Suggestions for standardisation of dose measurements and dose recording during mammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 6452373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality and dose in mammography in 17 countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: results from IAEA projects.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Avramova-Cholakova S; Beganovic A; Economides S; Faj D; Gershan V; Grupetta E; Kharita MH; Milakovic M; Milu C; Muhogora WE; Muthuvelu P; Oola S; Setayeshi S; Schandorf C; Ursulean I; Videnovic IR; Zaman A; Ziliukas J; Rehani MM
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2161-8. PubMed ID: 21665395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of radiation quality and doses in Japanese routine mammography.
    Fujisaki T; Igarashi A; Takahashi S; Watanabe K; Nishimura K; Abe S; Saitoh H; Fukuda K; Matsumoto M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jul; 62(8):436-41. PubMed ID: 12187840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality control during mammography-II (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 6452372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Use of the ROC method in problems of image quality and quality control in mammography].
    Wurm J; Säbel M; Weishaar J
    Rofo; 1982 Aug; 137(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6215307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE; Yagan R; Oravec D; Shah Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardization of image quality and radiation dose in mammography.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):648-54. PubMed ID: 2305044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of mammographic image quality: pilot study comparing five methods.
    Caldwell CB; Fishell EK; Jong RA; Weiser WJ; Yaffe MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 1632343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis.
    Monnin P; Marshall NW; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4221-38. PubMed ID: 21701050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mammography -a guidance level and the present situation of mammographic dose-].
    Terada H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12766282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.