BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4002122)

  • 1. Assessment of medical student fund of knowledge in surgery.
    Lawrence PF; Nelson EW; Cockayne TW
    Surgery; 1985 Jun; 97(6):745-9. PubMed ID: 4002122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does the subjective evaluation of medical student surgical knowledge correlate with written and oral exam performance?
    Awad SS; Liscum KR; Aoki N; Awad SH; Berger DH
    J Surg Res; 2002 May; 104(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 11971675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low correlation between subjective and objective measures of knowledge on surgery clerkships.
    Farrell TM; Kohn GP; Owen SM; Meyers MO; Stewart RA; Meyer AA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 May; 210(5):680-3, 683-5. PubMed ID: 20421029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do strong resident teachers help medical students on objective examinations of knowledge?
    Langenfeld SJ; Helmer SD; Cusick TE; Smith RS
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 21821211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral examinations: actual and perceived contributions to surgery clerkship performance.
    Zelenock GB; Calhoun JG; Hockman EM; Youmans LC; Erlandson EE; Davis WK; Turcotte JG
    Surgery; 1985 Jun; 97(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 4002121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the National Board of Medical Examiners' Surgery Subtest level the playing field?
    Hermanson B; Firpo M; Cochran A; Neumayer L
    Am J Surg; 2004 Nov; 188(5):520-1. PubMed ID: 15546562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resident and faculty differences in student evaluations: implications for changes in a clerkship grading system.
    Carline JD; Cook CE; Lennard ES; Siever M; Coluccio GM; Norman NL
    Surgery; 1986 Jul; 100(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 3726766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concordance of surgical clerkship performance and National Board of Medical Examiners Part II subtest scores. A validation model.
    Benenson TF; Stimmel B; Aufses A
    Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):692-6. PubMed ID: 7245030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?
    Weiss PM; Koller CA; Hess LW; Wasser T
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 16147799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Faculty and resident evaluations of medical students on a surgery clerkship correlate poorly with standardized exam scores.
    Goldstein SD; Lindeman B; Colbert-Getz J; Arbella T; Dudas R; Lidor A; Sacks B
    Am J Surg; 2014 Feb; 207(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24239528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in faculty evaluations of clerkship students attributable to surgical service.
    Plymale MA; French J; Donnelly MB; Iocono J; Pulito AR
    J Surg Educ; 2010; 67(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 20630430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability of a novel written examination to assess knowledge and clinical decision making skills of medical students on the surgery clerkship.
    Reinert A; Berlin A; Swan-Sein A; Nowygrod R; Fingeret A
    Am J Surg; 2014 Feb; 207(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 24216186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of student experience and performance in a surgical clerkship.
    Libbin JB; Hauge LS; Myers JA; Millikan KW
    Am Surg; 2003 Apr; 69(4):280-6; discussion 286. PubMed ID: 12716084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. General surgery versus specialty rotations: a new paradigm in surgery clerkships.
    Sandquist MK; Way DP; Patterson AF; Caniano DA; Arnold MW; Nwomeh BC
    J Surg Res; 2009 May; 153(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 18674785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlating surgical clerkship evaluations with performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners examination.
    Reid CM; Kim DY; Mandel J; Smith A; Bansal V
    J Surg Res; 2014 Jul; 190(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 24666987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors in faculty evaluation of medical students' performance.
    Pulito AR; Donnelly MB; Plymale M
    Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 41(7):667-75. PubMed ID: 17614887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test performance of a local examination at a nonlocal site for evaluation of surgical clerks.
    Dunnington G; Witzke D; Hassett J; Reisner L; Fulginiti J; Rubeck R
    Surgery; 1990 Aug; 108(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 2382223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clerkship site and duration: do they influence student performance?
    Jacobson MJ; Sherman L; Perlman I; Lefferts R; Soroff H
    Surgery; 1986 Aug; 100(2):306-11. PubMed ID: 3738757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do first- and second-year preclinical course scores predict student performance during the surgical clerkship?
    Baciewicz FA; Arent L; Weaver M; Yeasting R; Thomford N
    Surgery; 1990 May; 107(5):581-3. PubMed ID: 2333598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of medical students in a nontraditional rural clinical program, 1998-99 through 2003-04.
    Schauer RW; Schieve D
    Acad Med; 2006 Jul; 81(7):603-7. PubMed ID: 16799280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.