These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 400262)

  • 1. Comparison of three assay procedures for theophylline determination.
    Kampa IS; Dunikoski LK; Jarzabek JI; Grubesich D
    Ther Drug Monit; 1979; 1(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 400262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of homogeneous enzyme immunoassay and high-pressure liquid chromatography for the determination of theophylline concentration in serum.
    Koup JR; Brodsky B
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1978 Jun; 117(6):1135-8. PubMed ID: 352208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method for plasma theophylline analysis and its use in therapeutic drug monitoring.
    Starkey BJ; Mould GP
    Ther Drug Monit; 1984; 6(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 6390795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and precision of gas-liquid chromatographic, high-pressure liquid chromatographic, and enzyme immunoassay techniques for the measurement of theophylline concentrations in serum: a comparison based on external quality assurance measurements.
    Wilson JF; Marshall RW; Williams J; Richens A
    Ther Drug Monit; 1984; 6(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 6377601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assay of theophylline: comparison of EMIT on the ABA-100 to HPLC, GLC and UV procedures, with detailed evaluation of interferences.
    Weidner N; McDonald JM; Tieber VL; Smith CH; Kessler G; Ladenson JH; Dietzler DN
    Clin Chim Acta; 1979 Sep; 97(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 387295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of serum theophylline concentrations measured by high pressure liquid chromatography and quantitative enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique.
    Sheen AE; Sly RM; Hite S; Giblin VR; Hebert M
    Ann Allergy; 1979 Feb; 42(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 369408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three assay procedures for gentamicin determination.
    Giordano D; Breslin D; Kampa IS; Veenstra M
    Ther Drug Monit; 1982; 4(4):405-8. PubMed ID: 6760473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of radioimmunoassay with homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for the determination of theophylline concentration in serum.
    Forrester RL; Worrall J; Robertson WR; Wataji LJ; Wilhelm D
    Ther Drug Monit; 1979; 1(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 400265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring of serum theophylline concentrations by a fully mechanized enzyme immunoassay (EMIT).
    Oellerich M; Sybrecht GW; Haeckel R
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1979 May; 17(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 381565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a high performance liquid chromatographic and an enzyme immunoassay technique for quantitation of theophylline in serum.
    Boeckx RL; Frith EM; Simons FE
    Ther Drug Monit; 1979; 1(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 399811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Seralyzer and EMIT systems for determination of theophylline concentrations.
    Massoud N; Munzenberger P; Sarniak A
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Jul; 43(7):1722-6. PubMed ID: 3529948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Du Pont Theophylline Assay adapted to a centrifugal analyzer.
    Boeckx RL; Munson ST
    Ther Drug Monit; 1985; 7(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 3887672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct determination of theophylline in human serum by high-performance liquid chromatography using zwitterionic micellar mobile phase. Comparison with an enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique.
    Habel D; Guermouche S; Guermouche MH
    Analyst; 1993 Dec; 118(12):1511-3. PubMed ID: 8109754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Determination of theophylline, phenobarbital and valproic acid by chromatographic and immunologic technics. Comparison of methods].
    Vinçon G; Demotes-Mainard F; Bistue C; Jarry C; Brachet-Liermain A; Albin H
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1984; 42(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 6442547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A fluorescent immunoassay for theophylline: description and comparison to enzyme immunoassay, liquid chromatography and radioimmunoassay.
    Castro A; Steele B
    Clin Biochem; 1983 Oct; 16(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 6360416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assay of theophylline: in vivo and in vitro evaluation of dry chemistry and immunoassay versus high-performance liquid chromatography.
    Wallinder H; Gustafsson LL; Angbäck K; Höglund P; Magnusson A; Arvanius L
    Ther Drug Monit; 1991 May; 13(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 1926277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of caffeine: comparison of the manual enzyme multiplied immunoassay (EMIT), automated EMIT, and high-performance liquid chromatography procedures.
    Miceli JN; Aravind MK; Ferrell WJ
    Ther Drug Monit; 1984; 6(3):344-7. PubMed ID: 6390796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatographic procedure for the quantitative analysis of theophylline in serum samples.
    Lauff JJ
    J Chromatogr; 1987 Jun; 417(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 3624406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modification of the theophylline radioimmunoassay.
    Reed RC; Burkett ES; Myers CM; Schwartz HJ; Salazar R
    Ther Drug Monit; 1984; 6(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 6710556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra- and interlaboratory sources of imprecision in drug measurements by different techniques.
    Tsanaclis LM; Wilson JF
    Clin Chem; 1993 May; 39(5):851-5. PubMed ID: 8485875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.