BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4003144)

  • 1. Assessment of left ventricular function by noninvasive methods.
    Luisada AA; Singhal A; Portaluppi F
    Adv Cardiol; 1985; 32():111-41. PubMed ID: 4003144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlations between ejection times measured from the carotid pulse contour and the impedance cardiogram.
    Frey MA; Doerr BM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Oct; 54(10):894-7. PubMed ID: 6651710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuous noninvasive monitoring of left ventricular function during exercise by thoracic impedance cardiography-automated derivation of systolic time intervals.
    Sheps DS; Petrovick ML; Kizakevich PN; Wolfe C; Craige E
    Am Heart J; 1982 Apr; 103(4 Pt 1):519-24. PubMed ID: 7064793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [External methods of evaluating myocardial contractility].
    Cosyns J
    Acta Cardiol; 1972; 27(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 4537813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thoracocardiographic-derived left ventricular systolic time intervals.
    Bloch KE; Jugoon S; Sackner MA
    Chest; 1994 Dec; 106(6):1668-74. PubMed ID: 7988182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Impedance cardiography. Studies on healthy subjects. Notes on methodology and its clinical importance].
    Oreshkov V; Draganov V; Daskalov I
    Vutr Boles; 1979; 18(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 462940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left ventricular systolic time intervals. A comparison between the conventional carotid pulse curve method and the doppler ultrasound method.
    Hegrenaes L
    Eur Heart J; 1983 May; 4(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 6617677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative measurements of left ventricular ejection time by mechano-, echo- and electrical impedance cardiography.
    Stern HC; Wolf GK; Belz GG
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1985; 35(10):1582-6. PubMed ID: 4074418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography.
    Sherwood A; Allen MT; Fahrenberg J; Kelsey RM; Lovallo WR; van Doornen LJ
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Jan; 27(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 2187214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noninvasive index of cardiac contractility during stress testing: a collaborative study.
    Luisada AA; Singhal A; Portaluppi F; Strozzi C
    Clin Cardiol; 1985 Jul; 8(7):375-84. PubMed ID: 4017302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Phonomechanocardiography in the functional evaluation of the heart: 1) Apex cardiography, carotidogram, phonocardiogram].
    Guijarro Norales A
    Rev Clin Esp; 1975 Jan; 136(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1144830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Noninvasive studies of the left ventricular systolic function in patients over 65 years old].
    Schuster P; Seiwert FJ; Neuhaus C
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1990 Jun; 115(23):883-8. PubMed ID: 2354661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of cardiac output during exercise. Transthoracic impedance vs. heart rate alone.
    Horstmann E; Könn B
    Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 8052172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Systolic time intervals: indications and limitations in evaluation of left ventricular function].
    Ferro G; Tari MG; Chiarello M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1982; 12(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 7128996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of systolic time intervals over echocardiography in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Adenle B; Weir EK; Chesler E
    Minn Med; 1981 Aug; 64(8):479-83. PubMed ID: 7290044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of bioimpedance and echocardiography in measuring systolic heart function in cardiac patients.
    Kerkkamp HJ; Heethaar RM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1999 Apr; 873():149-54. PubMed ID: 10372163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of aortic valvular regurgitation upon the impedance cardiogram.
    Schieken RM; Patel MR; Falsetti HL; Barnes RW; Lauer RM
    Br Heart J; 1978 Sep; 40(9):958-63. PubMed ID: 708536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of myocardial performance during wheelchair ergometer exercise.
    Wilde SW; Miles DS; Durbin RJ; Sawka MN; Suryaprasad AG; Gotshall RW; Glaser RM
    Am J Phys Med; 1981 Dec; 60(6):277-91. PubMed ID: 7315952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac performance measured by impedance cardiography and radionuclide angiography.
    Pedersen T
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1984 Nov; 6(11):717-20. PubMed ID: 6530910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impedance plethysmography of thoracic region: impedance cardiography.
    Deshpande AK; Jindal GD; Jagasia PM; Murali KV; Bharadwaj PA; Tahilkar KI; Parulkar GB
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Oct; 36(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 2132246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.