These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4003144)

  • 1. Assessment of left ventricular function by noninvasive methods.
    Luisada AA; Singhal A; Portaluppi F
    Adv Cardiol; 1985; 32():111-41. PubMed ID: 4003144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlations between ejection times measured from the carotid pulse contour and the impedance cardiogram.
    Frey MA; Doerr BM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Oct; 54(10):894-7. PubMed ID: 6651710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuous noninvasive monitoring of left ventricular function during exercise by thoracic impedance cardiography-automated derivation of systolic time intervals.
    Sheps DS; Petrovick ML; Kizakevich PN; Wolfe C; Craige E
    Am Heart J; 1982 Apr; 103(4 Pt 1):519-24. PubMed ID: 7064793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [External methods of evaluating myocardial contractility].
    Cosyns J
    Acta Cardiol; 1972; 27(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 4537813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thoracocardiographic-derived left ventricular systolic time intervals.
    Bloch KE; Jugoon S; Sackner MA
    Chest; 1994 Dec; 106(6):1668-74. PubMed ID: 7988182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Impedance cardiography. Studies on healthy subjects. Notes on methodology and its clinical importance].
    Oreshkov V; Draganov V; Daskalov I
    Vutr Boles; 1979; 18(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 462940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left ventricular systolic time intervals. A comparison between the conventional carotid pulse curve method and the doppler ultrasound method.
    Hegrenaes L
    Eur Heart J; 1983 May; 4(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 6617677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative measurements of left ventricular ejection time by mechano-, echo- and electrical impedance cardiography.
    Stern HC; Wolf GK; Belz GG
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1985; 35(10):1582-6. PubMed ID: 4074418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography.
    Sherwood A; Allen MT; Fahrenberg J; Kelsey RM; Lovallo WR; van Doornen LJ
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Jan; 27(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 2187214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noninvasive index of cardiac contractility during stress testing: a collaborative study.
    Luisada AA; Singhal A; Portaluppi F; Strozzi C
    Clin Cardiol; 1985 Jul; 8(7):375-84. PubMed ID: 4017302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Phonomechanocardiography in the functional evaluation of the heart: 1) Apex cardiography, carotidogram, phonocardiogram].
    Guijarro Norales A
    Rev Clin Esp; 1975 Jan; 136(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1144830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Noninvasive studies of the left ventricular systolic function in patients over 65 years old].
    Schuster P; Seiwert FJ; Neuhaus C
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1990 Jun; 115(23):883-8. PubMed ID: 2354661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of cardiac output during exercise. Transthoracic impedance vs. heart rate alone.
    Horstmann E; Könn B
    Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 8052172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Systolic time intervals: indications and limitations in evaluation of left ventricular function].
    Ferro G; Tari MG; Chiarello M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1982; 12(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 7128996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of systolic time intervals over echocardiography in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Adenle B; Weir EK; Chesler E
    Minn Med; 1981 Aug; 64(8):479-83. PubMed ID: 7290044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of bioimpedance and echocardiography in measuring systolic heart function in cardiac patients.
    Kerkkamp HJ; Heethaar RM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1999 Apr; 873():149-54. PubMed ID: 10372163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of aortic valvular regurgitation upon the impedance cardiogram.
    Schieken RM; Patel MR; Falsetti HL; Barnes RW; Lauer RM
    Br Heart J; 1978 Sep; 40(9):958-63. PubMed ID: 708536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of myocardial performance during wheelchair ergometer exercise.
    Wilde SW; Miles DS; Durbin RJ; Sawka MN; Suryaprasad AG; Gotshall RW; Glaser RM
    Am J Phys Med; 1981 Dec; 60(6):277-91. PubMed ID: 7315952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac performance measured by impedance cardiography and radionuclide angiography.
    Pedersen T
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1984 Nov; 6(11):717-20. PubMed ID: 6530910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impedance plethysmography of thoracic region: impedance cardiography.
    Deshpande AK; Jindal GD; Jagasia PM; Murali KV; Bharadwaj PA; Tahilkar KI; Parulkar GB
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Oct; 36(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 2132246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.