227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4004003)
1. Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
Levy NS; Ellis E
Ann Ophthalmol; 1985 Apr; 17(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 4004003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of manual Goldmann and automated static visual fields using the Dicon 2000 perimeter in the detection of chiasmal tumors.
Wirtschafter JD; Coffman SM
Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Aug; 16(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 6497219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Poly-static quantitative perimetry for detection of open angle glaucoma].
Lai Z; Lao Y; Ai F
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 36(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 11853601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quantitative perimetry for early diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma].
Wu L
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Sep; 29(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 8168386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D
Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of semiautomated versus manual Goldmann kinetic perimetry in patients with visually significant glaucoma.
Ramirez AM; Chaya CJ; Gordon LK; Giaconi JA
J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18344756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of diagnostic performance and fixation control of two automated perimeters.
Asman P; Fingeret M
J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):763-8. PubMed ID: 9635382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kinetic and static fixation methods in automated threshold perimetry.
Asman P; Fingeret M; Robin A; Wild J; Pacey I; Greenfield D; Liebmann J; Ritch R
J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 10529927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
Bass SJ; Feldman J
Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A study of high-pass resolution perimetry in the early diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma].
Yu M; Zhou W; Ye T
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1996 Jul; 32(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 9590842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry].
Qi S; Jiang Y
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11955298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of static quantitative automated perimetry in the early diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma].
Shen ZM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 2507256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-wavelength automated perimetry can predict glaucomatous standard visual field loss by ten years.
Sit AJ; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
Semin Ophthalmol; 2004; 19(3-4):122-4. PubMed ID: 15590553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
