227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4004003)
21. [Changes in perimetric defects in chronic open-angle glaucoma studied by automated perimetry (Octopus)].
Fontan P; Maillard P; Bec P; Mathis A; Charlet JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 3839249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Study of changes in the central visual field in early computer-assisted diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma].
Dzhumova MF; Birich TA
Vestn Oftalmol; 1994; 110(3):3-5. PubMed ID: 7810041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Application of octopus 101 GKP kinetic and static automated perimetry in the diagnosis of the primary open angle glaucoma].
Zhong Y; Shi W; Zhao P; Ai FR; Wang RY
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2007 Jun; 29(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 17633473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Quantification of isopters using semiautomated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in glaucoma patients with advanced retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss].
Nowomiejska K; Rejdak R; Zarnowski T; Krapp E; Paetzold J; Schiefer U; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):228-30. PubMed ID: 15510508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.
North RV; Jones AL; Hunter E; Morgan JE; Wild JM
Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Problems and their solutions in today's perimetry].
Etienne R; Etienne A; Sellem E
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1983; 6(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 6345645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the oculo-kinetic perimetry glaucoma screening test in a sub-Saharan African setting.
Mahmoud AO; Omalase CO; Ekundayo K
West Afr J Med; 2008 Jul; 27(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 19256315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of conventional and pattern discrimination perimetry in a prospective study of glaucoma patients.
Ansari I; Chauhan BC; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 41(13):4150-7. PubMed ID: 11095608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer].
Lachkar Y; Barrault O; Lefrançois A; Demailly P
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9759403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma.
Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 16865008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Static perimetry in glaucoma (a comparison with kinetic perimetry).
Khamar BM
Indian J Ophthalmol; 1982 Jul; 30(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 7166424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Quantitative perimetry and glaucoma].
Demailly P; Barrault O
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1986; 9(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 3772032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
