These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4004003)
41. [Evaluation of the Friedmann visual field analyser in detecting glaucoma damage]. Xu LA Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 2507257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study. Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A clinical comparison of visual field testing between Goldmann-type manual perimetry and the Marco MT-336 automated perimeter. Jennings BJ; Drake SA J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Dec; 62(12):914-22. PubMed ID: 1814984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Learning effect in computerized perimetry]. Danielescu C; Chiseliţă D Oftalmologia; 2005; 49(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 15934336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT. Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [The Fieldmaster-200 computer perimeter: a comparative, controlled clinical study of its sensitivity and specificity in glaucomatous field defects (author's transl)]. Krieglstein GK; Glaab E; Gramer E Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Nov; 179(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7040780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Visual field screening and the development of a new screening program. Henson DB J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Dec; 60(12):893-8. PubMed ID: 2693509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Automated perimetry in a neuro-ophthalmologic practice. Schindler S; McCrary JA Ann Ophthalmol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 7258961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of a five-degree visual field between two programs of different testing field range. Fujimoto N Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):866-7. PubMed ID: 17452172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The psychometric function and reaction times of automated perimetry in normal and abnormal areas of the visual field in patients with glaucoma. Wall M; Maw RJ; Stanek KE; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 37(5):878-85. PubMed ID: 8603872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Overdiagnosis in glaucoma--a real problem?]. Zemba M; Cucu B; Stinghe A; Furedi G; Zugravu V; Lacusteanu M Oftalmologia; 2008; 52(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 19149124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Study of early glaucomatous visual field defects with the automatic perimeter Topcon SBP-1000. Comparative study with the Octopus 201 perimeter]. Lachenmayr B Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Jul; 191(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 3657015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Sensitivity of a new compression perimetric test in the diagnosis and prognosis of open-angle glaucoma]. Allakhverdiev RM; Kozlova LP Vestn Oftalmol; 1987; 103(2):9-12. PubMed ID: 3603959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]