These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4004170)

  • 1. The initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Gebarski SS; Gabrielsen TO; Gilman S; Knake JE; Latack JT; Aisen AM
    Ann Neurol; 1985 May; 17(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 4004170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple sclerosis. Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
    David P; Ristori GP; Elia M; Bartoli A; Ciervo A; Massaro AR; Carbone G
    Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1990 Jun; 12(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2403026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlations between clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings in multiple sclerosis.
    Boné G; Ladurner G; Artmann W; Bsteh C
    Eur Neurol; 1988; 28(4):212-6. PubMed ID: 3416890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in 39 multiple sclerosis patients.
    Comi G; Canal N; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A; Banfi G
    Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3629129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?
    Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M
    Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: magnetic resonance imaging compared with other paraclinical examinations.
    Rumbach L; Warter JM; Marescaux C; Gounot D; Chambron J; Collard M
    Eur Neurol; 1987; 27(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 3622587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trimodal evoked potentials compared with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Giesser BS; Kurtzberg D; Vaughan HG; Arezzo JC; Aisen ML; Smith CR; LaRocca NG; Scheinberg LC
    Arch Neurol; 1987 Mar; 44(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 3827679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The sensitivity of multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
    Guérit JM; Monje Argiles A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988 Sep; 70(3):230-8. PubMed ID: 2458229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
    Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
    Cutler JR; Aminoff MJ; Brant-Zawadzki M
    Ann Neurol; 1986 Nov; 20(5):645-8. PubMed ID: 3789682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients.
    Lebrun C; Bensa C; Debouverie M; Wiertlevski S; Brassat D; de Seze J; Rumbach L; Pelletier J; Labauge P; Brochet B; Tourbah A; Clavelou P;
    Arch Neurol; 2009 Jul; 66(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 19597085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Hamilton-Bruce MA; Black AB; Chappell DJ; Pannall PR
    Clin Exp Neurol; 1989; 26():89-97. PubMed ID: 2642142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative multiple sclerosis plaque assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. Its correlation with clinical parameters, evoked potentials, and intra-blood-brain barrier IgG synthesis.
    Baumhefner RW; Tourtellotte WW; Syndulko K; Waluch V; Ellison GW; Meyers LW; Cohen SN; Osborne M; Shapshak P
    Arch Neurol; 1990 Jan; 47(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 2294889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Laboratory and supplementary examinations in multiple sclerosis (a report of 32 cases)].
    Geng TC
    Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi; 1990 Jun; 23(3):153-5, 189-90. PubMed ID: 2390885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging in isolated noncompressive spinal cord syndromes.
    Miller DH; McDonald WI; Blumhardt LD; du Boulay GH; Halliday AM; Johnson G; Kendall BE; Kingsley DP; MacManus DG; Moseley IF
    Ann Neurol; 1987 Dec; 22(6):714-23. PubMed ID: 3435080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion to multiple sclerosis after a clinically isolated syndrome of the brainstem: cranial magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid and neurophysiological findings.
    Sastre-Garriga J; Tintoré M; Rovira A; Grivé E; Pericot I; Comabella M; Thompson AJ; Montalban X
    Mult Scler; 2003 Feb; 9(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 12617267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multimodal evoked responses and cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal immunoglobulins in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Ganes T; Brautaset NJ; Nyberg-Hansen R; Vandvik B
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1986 May; 73(5):472-6. PubMed ID: 3727924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of a prospective study on the value of combined visual, somatosensory, brainstem auditory evoked potentials and blink reflex measurements for disclosing subclinical lesions in suspected multiple sclerosis.
    Deltenre P; Van Nechel C; Vercruysse A; Strul S; Capon A; Ketelaer P
    Adv Neurol; 1982; 32():473-9. PubMed ID: 7054972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The combined use of instrumental and laboratory examinations in multiple sclerosis: is the diagnostic facilitation real?].
    Paolino E; Granieri E; Tola MR; Govoni V; Casetta I; Monetti VC; Carreras M
    Riv Neurol; 1990; 60(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 2247751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The usefulness of the somatosensory evoked potentials of the pudendal nerve in diagnosis of probable multiple sclerosis.
    Sau G; Siracusano S; Aiello I; d'Aloia G; Liguori G; Stener S; Lissiani A; Belgrano E
    Spinal Cord; 1999 Apr; 37(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 10338345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.