178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4004541)
1. Motion pattern analysis for evaluation and design of a prosthetic hook.
Gilad I
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Jun; 66(6):399-402. PubMed ID: 4004541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
Stein RB; Walley M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities.
Carey SL; Dubey RV; Bauer GS; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 19367522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks.
Bouwsema H; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jul; 25(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 20362374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of above elbow body-powered prostheses in visually guided unconstrained motion tasks.
Doeringer JA; Hogan N
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Jun; 42(6):621-31. PubMed ID: 7790019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.
Wright TW; Hagen AD; Wood MB
J Hand Surg Am; 1995 Jul; 20(4):619-22. PubMed ID: 7594289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks.
Carey SL; Jason Highsmith M; Maitland ME; Dubey RV
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1128-35. PubMed ID: 18675497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees.
Dudkiewicz I; Gabrielov R; Seiv-Ner I; Zelig G; Heim M
Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 26(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 14660200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.
Millstein SG; Heger H; Hunter GA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3725563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception.
Doubler JA; Childress DS
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1984 May; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 6527287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical application study of externally powered upper-limb prosthetics systems: the VA elbow, the VA hand, and the VA/NU myoelectric hand systems.
Lewis EA; Sheredos CR; Sowell TT; Houston VL
Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):51-136. PubMed ID: 776301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a prosthesis-control technique.
Doubler JA; Childress DS
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1984 May; 21(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 6527290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of arm/hand functioning in children with a congenital transverse or longitudinal reduction deficiency of the upper limb.
Buffart LM; Roebroeck ME; Pesch-Batenburg JM; Janssen WG; Stam HJ
Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 28(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 16393838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of myoelectric and conventional prostheses for adolescent amputees.
Weaver SA; Lange LR; Vogts VM
Am J Occup Ther; 1988 Feb; 42(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 3348341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recreational activities of lower extremity amputees: a survey.
Kegel B; Webster JC; Burgess EM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1980 Jun; 61(6):258-64. PubMed ID: 7377953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The "Z" strap: harnessing modification for patients with upper extremity amputations.
Reyburn TV
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Mar; 72(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 1998464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Upper extremity myoelectric prosthetics.
Uellendahl JE
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):639-52. PubMed ID: 10989484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prosthetic rehabilitation of geriatric amputee patients: a follow-up study.
Steinberg FU; Sunwoo I; Roettger RF
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Nov; 66(11):742-5. PubMed ID: 4062526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does having a computerized prosthetic knee influence cognitive performance during amputee walking?
Williams RM; Turner AP; Orendurff M; Segal AD; Klute GK; Pecoraro J; Czerniecki J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 16813788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
