These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4007177)

  • 1. A tumour gauge to measure breast lumps for use with mammograms.
    Gordon AB
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1985 Jun; 11(2):197-8. PubMed ID: 4007177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved determination of breast cancer size in mammography.
    Sphiris N; Panayiotakis G; Proimos B; Likaki H; Tzoracoleftherakis E
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8885094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical assessment of tumour size in primary breast carcinoma.
    Dixon JM; Senbanjo RO; Anderson TJ; Forrest AP; Elton RA
    Clin Oncol; 1984 Jun; 10(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 6734003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Correspondence of mammographic and pathological-anatomical tumor extent in breast cancer].
    Röder HU; Schäfer L; Schmidt B; Walter E
    Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 1849303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The importance of mammography for the determination of tumor size in stage classification of breast cancer according to the TNM system (5-years-results) (author's transl)].
    Hüttner J; Berndt H; Eichhorn HJ
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1979; 49(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 383036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography in hospital patients: use and misuse.
    Woods WG; Earlam RJ; Turner MJ
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Feb; 37(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 1573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography.
    Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B
    Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study of tissue compression in breast phantoms: possible implications for the use of X-ray mammography as a method of imaging breast carcinoma.
    Watmough DJ; Quan KM; Aspden RM; Mallard JR
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Dec; 18(6):538-44. PubMed ID: 1478286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mammography as primary and secondary information sources].
    Nährig G; Baldauf K
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1982 Jan; 76(1-2):2-6. PubMed ID: 7080516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of mammographic findings after breast-conserving therapy for carcinoma of the breast.
    Sardi A; Eckholdt G; McKinnon WM; Bolton JS
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Oct; 173(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 1925902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Perioperative ultrasound examination of the breast in breast cancer].
    Ernst R; Weber A; Bauer KH; Friemann J; Zumtobel V
    Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(15):963-75. PubMed ID: 2238972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods.
    Pain JA; Ebbs SR; Hern RP; Lowe S; Bradbeer JW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Feb; 18(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 1737593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance of vascularity of the breast: a quantitative approach using xeromammography.
    Raskin MM; Martinez-Lopez M
    Rev Interam Radiol; 1977 Apr; 2(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 866901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized tomography of breast cancer and regional lymph nodes.
    Hahn H; Hoeffken W
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):165-9. PubMed ID: 3849366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pure and mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast: pathologic basis for differences in mammographic appearance.
    Wilson TE; Helvie MA; Oberman HA; Joynt LK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 7618541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Growth rate of breast cancer, implication for early detection and therapeutic effects].
    von Fournier D; Abel U; Spratt JA; Spratt JS; Anton HW
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 May; 54(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 8050689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Breast saving therapy of breast cancer: sensitivity of mammography in relation to primary tumor size].
    Stierli P; Spichtig S; Aeberhard P
    Helv Chir Acta; 1992 May; 59(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 1526836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
    Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
    Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technologic considerations for breast tumor size assessment.
    Davis PL; McCarty KS
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 7489313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.