BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4007327)

  • 1. [Physiologico-acoustic aspects of improving speech perception in sensorineural and conductive hearing loss].
    Moroz BS
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 4007327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to help your patient cope with hearing loss.
    McCartney JH; Nadler G
    Geriatrics; 1979 Mar; 34(3):69-71, 75-6. PubMed ID: 428727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Hearing, listening and understanding].
    Schmidt PH; Groen JJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1982 Mar; 126(11):457-61. PubMed ID: 7078671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Distorted Freiburg Speech Test].
    Dieroff HG; Meissner W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Sep; 64(9):466-9. PubMed ID: 4079625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech discrimination and effectiveness of hearing aids under listening conditions similar to those of a transit operator.
    Lee LA; Chung DY; Gannon RP
    J Otolaryngol; 1981 Jun; 10(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 7277564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of wireless and acoustic hearing aid-based telephone listening strategies.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 20808225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of the bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral hearing loss.
    Wazen JJ; Spitzer J; Ghossaini SN; Kacker A; Zschommler A
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):955-8. PubMed ID: 11404603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing aids and otosclerosis.
    Johnson EW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1993 Jun; 26(3):491-502. PubMed ID: 8341576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiological and acoustic aspects of improvement of speech reception in nerve and conduction deafness.
    Moroz BS
    Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 4086032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study of binaural interaction in sensorineural hearing loss in children in the light of electroacoustic correction of hearing].
    Belov IM; Kuks EN; Ismagulova FSh
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1988; (5):59-63. PubMed ID: 3227593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of suprasegmental speech features via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant on one ear and hearing aid on the other.
    Most T; Harel T; Shpak T; Luntz M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 20844254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing disability and hearing aid benefit related to type of hearing impairment.
    Carlin WV; Browning GG
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1990 Feb; 15(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 2323083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Hearing disorder. Mechanical management of hearing loss: conventional and implantable hearing aids].
    Leuwer R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 May; 84 Suppl 1():S51-9. PubMed ID: 15846541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rehabilitative treatment of hearing-impaired children.
    Ling D
    J Otolaryngol; 1977 Aug; 6(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 616445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effect of the frequency characteristics of hearing aids on speech perception in children with neurosensory hearing loss].
    Kuks EN; Kireeva GA; Poliakova SK
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1990; (2):22-6. PubMed ID: 2360302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Choice of rehabilitation in patients with mixed hypoacusis].
    Pogosov VS; Kapustina TA; Petrovskaia AN
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2001; (3):23-5. PubMed ID: 11510040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of binaural hearing aids.
    Markides A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():181-96. PubMed ID: 6955925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.