98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4008237)
1. When procedures limit rights: from Quinlan to Conroy.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 4008237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan.
Lynn J
Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in the Claire Conroy case.
Nevins MA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1986 Feb; 34(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 3944404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Judicial postponement of death recognition: the tragic case of Mary O'Connor.
Gindes D
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):301-31. PubMed ID: 2513713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3147972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What criteria should guide decision makers for incompetent patients?
Emanuel EJ
Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8578):170-1. PubMed ID: 2892998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal aspects of withdrawing nourishment.
Horan DJ; Grant ER
J Leg Med; 1984 Dec; 5(4):595-632. PubMed ID: 6394680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A schizophrenic decision on Conroy.
Bank LG
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 3700078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. At law. Transferring the ethical hot potato.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Feb; 17(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 3557940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The case of Claire Conroy: will administrative review safeguard incompetent patients?
Lo B; Dornbrand L
Ann Intern Med; 1986 Jun; 104(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 3085567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prisoner in the ICU: the tragedy of William Bartling.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Dec; 14(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 6511377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 6438020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nancy Beth Cruzan: in no voice at all.
Wolf SM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 2312269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Future trends in the legal rights of patients in nursing homes.
Hoffman BF
CMAJ; 1989 Jul; 141(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 2659158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fashion and freedom: when artificial feeding should be withdrawn.
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 1985 Jun; 75(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 3923847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. State interests in terminating medical treatment.
Blake DC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(3):5-13. PubMed ID: 2486743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding nutrition and mistrusting nurturance: the vocabulary of In re Conroy.
Burt RA
Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 3104232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
