99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4008237)
21. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
Merritt TL
Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Court's guidelines on incompetent patients compromise their rights.
Connery JR
Hosp Prog; 1980 Sep; 61(9):46-9. PubMed ID: 10248004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Nursing home residents' right to refuse treatment.
Eichler BL
J Med Soc N J; 1985 May; 82(5):359-61. PubMed ID: 3858550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment.
Ferguson G
Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die?
Denbo SM
Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
Annas GJ
N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Court responses to withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and fluids.
Paris JJ; Reardon FE
JAMA; 1985 Apr; 253(15):2243-5. PubMed ID: 3919194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey.
Levant S
Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Substituting our judgment.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 1587729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.
Johnson SH
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patients' rights in a nursing home.
Schwartz HE
Md Med J; 1993 Apr; 42(4):377-8. PubMed ID: 8515697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept?
Robertson ED
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 2621091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Futile care. Physicians should not be allowed to refuse to treat. Point.
Veatch RM; Spicer CM
Health Prog; 1993 Dec; 74(10):22-7. PubMed ID: 10130086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Substituted judgment: best interests in disguise.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Jun; 13(3):8-11. PubMed ID: 6885405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Decision making and patients' rights.
Doudera AE
J Am Health Care Assoc; 1985 May; 11(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 10271119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Transfer and discharge of nursing home residents: consequences and rights.
Gershuny L
Med Trial Tech Q; 1983; 29(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 11654887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Elizabeth Bouvia: whose space is this anyway?
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 3084400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
