BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4009123)

  • 1. Observing response acquisition: preference for unpredictable appetitive rewards obtained under conditions predicted by DMOD.
    Daly HB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):294-316. PubMed ID: 4009123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preference for unpredictable food rewards occurs with high proportion of reinforced trials or alcohol if rewards are not delayed.
    Daly HB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jan; 15(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2926334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in learning about aversive nonreward accounts for ontogeny of paradoxical appetitive reward effects in the rat pup: a mathematical model (DMOD) integrates results.
    Daly HB
    Psychol Bull; 1991 Mar; 109(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 2034754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ADHD and delay aversion: the influence of non-temporal stimulation on choice for delayed rewards.
    Antrop I; Stock P; Verté S; Wiersema JR; Baeyens D; Roeyers H
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1152-8. PubMed ID: 17076754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing "self-control": The paradoxical effect of delay of reinforcement.
    Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2020 Mar; 48(1):165-172. PubMed ID: 32026400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions aimed at changing impulsive choice in rats: Effects of immediate and relatively long delay to reward training.
    Fox AE; Visser EJ; Nicholson AM
    Behav Processes; 2019 Jan; 158():126-136. PubMed ID: 30468886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal that learns a spatial delayed response task.
    Suri RE; Schultz W
    Neuroscience; 1999; 91(3):871-90. PubMed ID: 10391468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delay aversion but preference for large and rare rewards in two choice tasks: implications for the measurement of self-control parameters.
    Adriani W; Laviola G
    BMC Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 7():52. PubMed ID: 16796752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on choice between small certain rewards and large uncertain rewards in rats.
    Cardinal RN; Howes NJ
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 May; 6():37. PubMed ID: 15921529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involvement of the rat anterior cingulate cortex in control of instrumental responses guided by reward expectancy.
    Schweimer J; Hauber W
    Learn Mem; 2005; 12(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 15930509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human observing: maintained by negative informative stimuli only if correlated with improvement in response efficiency.
    Case DA; Fantino E; Wixted J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 May; 43(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 4020320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of dopaminergic drugs on delayed reward as a measure of impulsive behavior in rats.
    Wade TR; de Wit H; Richards JB
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 May; 150(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 10867981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The present values of delayed rewards are approximately additive.
    Kirby KN
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16621330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing pleasure and pain: the fundamental mathematical equivalence of reward gain and shock reduction under variable interval schedules.
    Mallpress DE; Fawcett TW; McNamara JM; Houston AI
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 23144510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nucleus accumbens core lesions retard instrumental learning and performance with delayed reinforcement in the rat.
    Cardinal RN; Cheung TH
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 6():9. PubMed ID: 15691387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Building blocks of self-control: increased tolerance for delay with bundled rewards.
    Ainslie G; Monterosso JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 12696740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alcohol-induced impulsivity in rats: an effect of cue salience?
    Olmstead MC; Hellemans KG; Paine TA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Jan; 184(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 16378218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate reinforcement in delayed reward learning in pigeons.
    Winter J; Perkins CC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Sep; 38(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 16812295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utilization of odor cues as a function of reward-magnitude contrast and delay of reinforcement.
    Davis SF; Weaver MS; Janzen WC; Travis-Neideffer MN
    J Gen Psychol; 1985 Apr; 112(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 4056762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response bias is unaffected by delay length in a delay discounting paradigm.
    Wilhelm CJ; Mitchell SH
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):445-9. PubMed ID: 20188800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.