These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4010257)
21. Voice low tone to high tone ratio: a potential quantitative index for vowel [a:] and its nasalization. Lee GS; Wang CP; Yang CC; Kuo TB IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1437-9. PubMed ID: 16830950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: evidence for partial compensation. Beddor PS; Krakow RA J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2868-87. PubMed ID: 10573902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Coarticulation effects on the nasalization of vowels using nasal/voice amplitude ratio instrumentation. Larson PL; Hamlet SL Cleft Palate J; 1987 Oct; 24(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 3479274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of articulatory adjustment on reducing hypernasality. Rong P; Kuehn D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1438-48. PubMed ID: 22411285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings. Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Relation of selected acoustical parameters and perceptual ratings to voice quality of Down syndrome children. Pentz AL; Gilbert HR Am J Ment Defic; 1983 Sep; 88(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 6227243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of information on listeners' attitudes toward speakers with voice or resonance disorders. Lallh AK; Rochet AP J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):782-95. PubMed ID: 10877445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech. Tardif M; Berti LC; Marino VCC; Pardo J; Bressmann T Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2018; 70(3-4):183-190. PubMed ID: 30184539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of listener training on the perceptual assessment of hypernasality. Oliveira AC; Scarmagnani RH; Fukushiro AP; Yamashita RP Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 27191877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spectral properties and quantitative evaluation of hypernasality in vowels. Kataoka R; Michi K; Okabe K; Miura T; Yoshida H Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jan; 33(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8849858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model. Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2217-24. PubMed ID: 14587619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spectral characteristics of hypernasality in maxillectomy patients. Yoshida H; Furuya Y; Shimodaira K; Kanazawa T; Kataoka R; Takahashi K J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Aug; 27(8):723-30. PubMed ID: 10931270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability of perceptual voice assessment. Blaustein S; Bar A J Commun Disord; 1983 Mar; 16(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 6345597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Acoustic analysis and detection of hypernasality using a group delay function. Vijayalakshmi P; Reddy MR; O'Shaughnessy D IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 17405369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Automatic Evaluation of Voice Quality Using Text-Based Laryngograph Measurements and Prosodic Analysis. Haderlein T; Schwemmle C; Döllinger M; Matoušek V; Ptok M; Nöth E Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():316325. PubMed ID: 26136813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children using cepstral analyses: a movement toward increased recording stability. Diercks GR; Ojha S; Infusino S; Maurer R; Hartnick CJ JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 139(8):811-6. PubMed ID: 23949356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perception of English vowels by bilingual Chinese-English and corresponding monolingual listeners. Yang J; Fox RA Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):215-37. PubMed ID: 25102607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of different voice samples for perceptual analysis. Revis J; Giovanni A; Wuyts F; Triglia J Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1999; 51(3):108-16. PubMed ID: 10394058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. HONC measures in men and women: validity and variability. Sussman JE Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Jan; 32(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 7727486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]