180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4010571)
1. Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence.
Norcini JJ; Swanson DB; Grosso LJ; Webster GD
Med Educ; 1985 May; 19(3):238-47. PubMed ID: 4010571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of knowledge, synthesis, and clinical judgment. Multiple-choice questions in the assessment of physician competence.
Norcini JJ; Swanson DB; Grosso LJ; Shea JA; Webster GD
Eval Health Prof; 1984 Dec; 7(4):485-99. PubMed ID: 10269331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of a 25-item low-stakes multiple-choice assessment of bronchoscopic knowledge.
Quadrelli S; Davoudi M; Galíndez F; Colt HG
Chest; 2009 Feb; 135(2):315-321. PubMed ID: 18849404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?
Hift RJ
BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
Mahmood H
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of clinical-scenario (case cluster) versus stand-alone multiple choice questions in a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate medicine.
Vuma S; Sa B
J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 31435208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.
Vegada B; Shukla A; Khilnani A; Charan J; Desai C
Indian J Pharmacol; 2016; 48(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 27721545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
Collins J
Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting Performance on Clerkship Examinations and USMLE Step 1: What Is the Value of Open-Ended Question Examination?
Boscardin CK; Earnest G; Hauer KE
Acad Med; 2020 Nov; 95(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Research in Medical Education Presentations):S109-S113. PubMed ID: 32769460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Global Health Education: The Role of Multiple-Choice Questions.
Douthit NT; Norcini J; Mazuz K; Alkan M; Feuerstein MT; Clarfield AM; Dwolatzky T; Solomonov E; Waksman I; Biswas S
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():640204. PubMed ID: 34368038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Single best answer MCQs: a new format for the FRCR part 2a exam.
McCoubrie P; McKnight L
Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 18374712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.
Shigli K; Nayak SS; Gali S; Sankeshwari B; Fulari D; Shyam Kishore K; Upadhya P N; Jirge V
J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Oct; 110(5):455-458. PubMed ID: 30129514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.
Mee J; Pandian R; Wolczynski J; Morales A; Paniagua M; Harik P; Baldwin P; Clauser BE
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):783-801. PubMed ID: 37665413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil: Making a continued case for the use of MCQs in medical education.
Pugh D; De Champlain A; Touchie C
Med Teach; 2019 May; 41(5):569-577. PubMed ID: 30299196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.
Palmer EJ; Devitt PG
BMC Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 7():49. PubMed ID: 18045500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The validity of an experimental video examination.
Shea JA; Norcini JJ; Baranowski RA; Langdon LO
Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():290-5. PubMed ID: 2464299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing a script concordance examination to a multiple-choice examination on a core internal medicine clerkship.
Kelly W; Durning S; Denton G
Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22775780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
