These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4010633)

  • 1. Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography.
    Johns PC; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 4010633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results.
    Johns PC; Drost DJ; Yaffe MJ; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 4010634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement.
    Saito M
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4236-46. PubMed ID: 18072488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal-to-noise ratio evaluation in dual-energy radiography with synchrotron radiation.
    Fabbri S; Taibi A; Longo R; Marziani M; Olivo A; Pani S; Tuffanelli A; Gambaccini M
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Nov; 47(22):4093-105. PubMed ID: 12476984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
    Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of electrostatic imaging systems for minimum patient dose or minimum exposure in mammography.
    Muntz EP; Welkowsky M; Kaegi E; Morsell L; Wilkinson E; Jacobson G
    Radiology; 1978 May; 127(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 644080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of anatomical noise on optimal beam quality in mammography.
    Cederström B; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121903. PubMed ID: 25471963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in dual-screen computed radiography.
    Shaw CC; Wang TP; Breitenstein DS; Gur D
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1293-302. PubMed ID: 9284253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging.
    Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Muller S; Ebrahimi M; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051910. PubMed ID: 23635280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ai K; Gao Y; Yu G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporation of scattered radiation into dual-energy radiologic theory and application to mammography.
    Johns PC; Beauregard RM
    Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1455-62. PubMed ID: 7838057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type.
    Fahrig R; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1473-81. PubMed ID: 7838059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-energy digital mammography utilizing stimulated phosphor computed radiography.
    Brettle DS; Cowen AR
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Nov; 39(11):1989-2004. PubMed ID: 15560006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging.
    Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Saab-Puong S; Iordache R; Muller S; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081907. PubMed ID: 23927321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating noise reduction techniques while considering anatomical noise in dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography.
    Allec N; Abbaszadeh S; Scott CC; Karim KS; Lewin JM
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051904. PubMed ID: 23635274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.