These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4010770)

  • 1. UK embryo research: embryo protection bill resurfaces.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Jun 13-19; 315(6020):534. PubMed ID: 4010770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research on embryos.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8426):469. PubMed ID: 2857850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. UK embryo research: government stops Powell bill.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Apr; 314(6012):573. PubMed ID: 11658568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Embryos untouched.
    Nature; 1985 Feb 21-27; 313(6004):612. PubMed ID: 3974693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Embryo research. Chances of legislation fade.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Nov 21-27; 318(6043):197. PubMed ID: 4069194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mr. Enoch Powell's bill.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1985 May; 1(8438):1170. PubMed ID: 11644484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Embryo research: the significance of the new law.
    Samuels A; Barrister JP
    Med Sci Law; 1991 Apr; 31(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 2062192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mr. Powell's bill on the creation and use of human embryos.
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8424):357. PubMed ID: 11644478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Politicians prepare action.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Jan 24-30; 313(6000):260. PubMed ID: 3969138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A bill that should be stopped.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Feb; 290(6468):586. PubMed ID: 3918682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications and consequences of the German Embryo Protection Act.
    Beier HM; Beckman JO
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Apr; 6(4):607-8. PubMed ID: 1918316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handling the human embryo.
    Nature; 1984 May 31-Jun 6; 309(5967):387. PubMed ID: 6727993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Warnock recommendations: Mr. Powell and his fellow opponents renew their campaign.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1985 Jul; 2(8447):166-7. PubMed ID: 11644449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Britain hazards embryo research.
    Nature; 1987 Dec 3-9; 330(6147):407. PubMed ID: 3683557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Warnock report.
    Warnock M
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6489):187-90. PubMed ID: 3926117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond the HFE Act of 1990: the regulation of stem cell research in the UK.
    Plomer A
    Med Law Rev; 2002; 10(2):132-64. PubMed ID: 14982080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Better safe than sorry.
    Bray J
    Nature; 1985 Mar; 314(6009):310. PubMed ID: 11645773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Embryo research.
    Nature; 1990 Apr; 344(6268):690. PubMed ID: 2330024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unborn children (protection) bill.
    Evans HJ; McLaren A
    Nature; 1985 Mar 14-20; 314(6007):127-8. PubMed ID: 3974717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Powell bites dust: the British government needs to think hard about surrogacy.
    Nature; 1985 Apr; 314(6012):568. PubMed ID: 11658566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.