BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4011074)

  • 1. Antepartum nonstress test and the postmature pregnancy.
    Fleischer A; Schulman H; Farmakides G; Perrotta LA; McGovern G; Katz N
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jul; 66(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 4011074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group.
    Hannah ME; Hannah WJ; Hellmann J; Hewson S; Milner R; Willan A
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Jun; 326(24):1587-92. PubMed ID: 1584259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal surveillance vs. labor induction at 42 weeks in postterm gestation.
    Dyson DC
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 3361516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of an epidemiologic study of postdate pregnancy.
    Sachs BP; Friedman EA
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Mar; 31(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 3701715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Management of post-date pregnancy: a case control study.
    Kassis A; Mazor M; Leiberman JR; Cohen A; Insler V
    Isr J Med Sci; 1991 Feb; 27(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 2004889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuing role of the nonstress test in the management of postdates pregnancy.
    Phelan JP; Platt LD; Yeh SY; Trujillo M; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 6493655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome?
    Weiss PM; Balducci J; Reed J; Klasko SK; Rust OA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(6):317-9. PubMed ID: 9438212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breech delivery and foetal outcome: a review of 291 cases.
    Mekbib TA
    Ethiop Med J; 1995 Jul; 33(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 7588656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome.
    Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrauterine growth retarded infants. Correlation of gestational age with maternal factors, mode of delivery, and perinatal survival.
    Perry CP; Harris RE; DeLemos RA; Null DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Aug; 48(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 940650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perinatal characteristics of uncomplicated postdate pregnancies.
    Eden RD; Seifert LS; Winegar A; Spellacy WN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):296-9. PubMed ID: 3822274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in late-term and post-term pregnancy. NEOSANO perinatal network's experience in Mexico.
    De Los Santos-Garate AM; Villa-Guillen M; Villanueva-García D; Vallejos-Ruíz ML; Murguía-Peniche MT;
    J Perinatol; 2011 Dec; 31(12):789-93. PubMed ID: 21681180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal monitoring in a community hospital. A statistical analysis.
    Amato JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 50(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 896093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor.
    Shenker L; Post RC; Seiler JS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 1153149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.