These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4011863)

  • 1. Variations in measured computed tomography number values.
    Faulkner K; Moores BM
    Radiography; 1985; 51(597):163-7. PubMed ID: 4011863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values.
    Levi C; Gray JE; McCullough EC; Hattery RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Sep; 139(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 6981306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interphantom and interscanner variations for Hounsfield units--establishment of reference values for HU in a commercial QA phantom.
    Sande EP; Martinsen AC; Hole EO; Olerud HM
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5123-35. PubMed ID: 20714048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new phantom for evaluation of low-contrast detectability of X-ray CT scanner.
    Endo M; Iinuma TA; Takenaka E; Inoue M
    Radiat Med; 1984; 2(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 6543966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative assessment of the influence of location, internal temperature, idle time, and normalization on the sensitivity of a mobile PET/CT scanner.
    Belakhlef S; Church C; Hays A; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2008 Sep; 36(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 18703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards establishment of the national reference dose levels from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania.
    Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Jun; 26(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 16738417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods.
    Sawyer LJ; Starritt HC; Hiscock SC; Evans MJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 18094636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An inaccuracy in computed tomography: the energy dependence of CT values.
    Zatz LM; Alvarez RE
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 866662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Single-slice and multi-slice computerized tomography: dosimetric comparison with diagnostic reference dose levels].
    Moro L; Bolsi A; Baldi M; Bertoli G; Fantinato D
    Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 11740455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the Meditech M250 and a comparison with other CT scanners.
    Greensmith R; Richardson RB; Sargood AJ; Stevens PH; Mackintosh IP
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 58(695):1065-9. PubMed ID: 3842612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise and contrast detection in computed tomography images.
    Faulkner K; Moores BM
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 Apr; 29(4):329-39. PubMed ID: 6718487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT-number variability in thoracic geometry.
    McCullough EC; Morin RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jul; 141(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 6602510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of CT section thickness by using the partial volume effect.
    Shiraishi J; Tsuda K; Inoue Y; Onoyama Y
    Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):870-2. PubMed ID: 1509082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mass estimates by computed tomography: physical density from CT numbers.
    Mull RT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Nov; 143(5):1101-4. PubMed ID: 6333158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Baseline subtraction in quantitative cardiovascular computed tomography.
    Guthaner DF; Nassi M; Bradley B
    Radiology; 1983 Mar; 146(3):807-10. PubMed ID: 6828697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The effect of beam hardening on CT values].
    Weidenmaier W; Christ G
    Rofo; 1985 Dec; 143(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 3001864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of CT noise on detectability of test objects.
    Chew E; Weiss GH; Brooks RA; Di Chiro G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Oct; 131(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 102161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.