These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4011920)

  • 21. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
    Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exposure reduction through faster speed film-screen systems and a review of A.L.A.R.A. (as low as reasonably achievable).
    Nickoli PC
    Can J Med Radiat Technol; 1993 Aug; 24(3):98-107. PubMed ID: 10127889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exposure variations under error conditions in automatic exposure controlled film-screen projection radiography.
    Walsh C; Larkin A; Dennan S; O'Reilly G
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Nov; 77(923):931-3. PubMed ID: 15507417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Technical evaluation of a digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):264-70. PubMed ID: 7892483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient absorbed doses in digital grey-scale fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Taylor C
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Jul; 59(703):689-93. PubMed ID: 3730767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Practical quality assurance in x-ray diagnosis (author's transl)].
    Stender HS
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Dec; 33(12):618-25. PubMed ID: 7455537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An investigation into the performance of an automated quality assurance and dosimetry system in diagnostic radiology.
    Chapple CL; Faulkner K; Harrison RM
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Aug; 63(752):635-9. PubMed ID: 2400880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An investigation into techniques for reducing doses from neo-natal radiographic examinations.
    Wraith CM; Martin CJ; Stockdale EJ; McDonald S; Farquhar B
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Oct; 68(814):1074-82. PubMed ID: 7496707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Assuring image quality in roentgen diagnostic services--information on DIN 6868. Part 2. Film processing: evaluating the uniformity of visual optic density].
    Becker-Gaab C; Borcke E; Bunde E; Hagemann G; Kütterer G; Lang GR; Schöfer H; Stender HS; Stieve FE; von Volkmann T
    Rontgenpraxis; 1987 Feb; 40(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3576371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technique charts: the key to radiographic quality.
    Eastman TR
    Radiol Technol; 1975; 46(5):365-8. PubMed ID: 1118546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
    Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
    Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Image-intensifier photofluorography and conventional chest radiography: comparison of diagnostic efficacy.
    Manninen H; Partanen K; Soimakallio S; Rytkönen H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Mar; 150(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 3257605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Average radiation exposure values for three diagnostic radiographic examinations.
    Rueter FG; Conway BJ; McCrohan JL; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 1990 Nov; 177(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 2217766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 5: organ doses in chest radiography].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):454-71. PubMed ID: 19391068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.