These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4013086)
1. Lower thresholds of motion for gratings as a function of eccentricity and contrast. Johnston A; Wright MJ Vision Res; 1985; 25(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 4013086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship of displacement thresholds for oscillating gratings to cortical magnification, spatiotemporal frequency and contrast. Wright MJ; Johnston A Vision Res; 1985; 25(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 4013087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Matching velocity in central and peripheral vision. Johnston A; Wright MJ Vision Res; 1986; 26(7):1099-109. PubMed ID: 3798745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual field locus. Wright MJ; Johnston A Vision Res; 1983; 23(10):983-9. PubMed ID: 6649443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lower threshold of motion for one and two dimensional patterns in central and peripheral vision. Wright MJ; Gurney KN Vision Res; 1992 Jan; 32(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 1502798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast dependence of the oscillatory motion threshold across the visual field. Wesemann W; Norcia AM J Opt Soc Am A; 1992 Oct; 9(10):1663-71. PubMed ID: 1403240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrimination of moving gratings at and above detection threshold. Thompson P Vision Res; 1983; 23(12):1533-8. PubMed ID: 6666055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inhomogeneity and anisotropies for motion detection in the monocular visual field of human observers. van de Grind WA; Koenderink JJ; van Doorn AJ; Milders MV; Voerman H Vision Res; 1993 May; 33(8):1089-107. PubMed ID: 8506647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of peripheral field stimulation during monocular and dichoptic viewing. Marrocco RT; Carpenter MA; Wright SE Vision Res; 1985; 25(7):917-24. PubMed ID: 4049741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The sensitivity of the peripheral visual system to amplitude-modulation and frequency-modulation of sine-wave patterns. Jamar JH; Kwakman LF; Koenderink JJ Vision Res; 1984; 24(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 6719838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the mechanism that encodes the movement of contrast variations: velocity discrimination. Turano K; Pantle A Vision Res; 1989; 29(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 2800348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multiple-channel model for grating detection. Jaschinski-Kruza W; Cavonius CR Vision Res; 1984; 24(9):933-41. PubMed ID: 6506481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motion of chromatic stimuli: first-order or second-order? Cropper SJ; Derrington AM Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 8116268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of spatial frequency on the reaction times and evoked potentials recorded to grating pattern stimuli. Musselwhite MJ; Jeffreys DA Vision Res; 1985; 25(11):1545-55. PubMed ID: 3832578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings. Müller R; Greenlee MW Vision Res; 1994 Aug; 34(16):2071-92. PubMed ID: 7941406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]