These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4016530)

  • 1. Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Wale RJ; Royston CM; Bennett JR; Buckton GK
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 4016530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux: symptomatic and objective assessment.
    Weaver RM; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 4051424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appraisal of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis based on clinical and manometric data and pH monitoring.
    de Caestecker JS; Ross HM; Heading RC; Macleod IB
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1989 Feb; 34(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 2709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reflux versus dysphagia: an objective evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Morris DL; Jones J; Evans DF; Foster G; Smart H; Gregson R; Amar S; Doran J; Hardcastle JD
    Br J Surg; 1985 Dec; 72(12):1017-20. PubMed ID: 4084744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Kauten JR; Mansour KA
    Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.
    Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis--some reservations.
    Durrans D; Armstrong CP; Taylor TV
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):525-7. PubMed ID: 4016531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis and postoperative dysphagia.
    Leguit P; Hagen WB; Laarman J
    Neth J Surg; 1987 Jun; 39(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 3614751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
    Kmiot WA; Kirby RM; Akinola D; Temple JG
    Br J Surg; 1991 Oct; 78(10):1181-4. PubMed ID: 1958979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term results of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux.
    Maxwell-Armstrong CA; Steele RJ; Amar SS; Evans D; Morris DL; Foster GE; Hardcastle JD
    Br J Surg; 1997 Jun; 84(6):862-4. PubMed ID: 9189111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Severe dysphagia from an Angelchik prosthesis: futility of routine esophageal testing.
    Demmy TL; Caron NR; Curtis JJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1660-1. PubMed ID: 8010825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized controlled trial comparing Nissen fundoplication and the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Hill AD; Walsh TN; Bolger CM; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1994 Jan; 81(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 8313128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on esophageal and gastric function.
    Maddern GJ; Myers JC; McIntosh N; Bridgewater FH; Jamieson GG
    Arch Surg; 1991 Nov; 126(11):1418-22. PubMed ID: 1747057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. A community experience.
    Smith RS; Chang FC; Hayes KA; deBakker J
    Am J Surg; 1985 Dec; 150(6):735-8. PubMed ID: 4073367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intractable dysphagia following placement of Angelchik prosthesis for reflux esophagitis.
    Battaglini JW; Schorlemmer GR; Frantz PT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1983 May; 35(5):551-2. PubMed ID: 6847293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gastro-oesophageal reflux and oesophagitis before and after vagotomy for duodenal ulcer.
    Flook D; Stoddard CJ
    Br J Surg; 1985 Oct; 72(10):804-7. PubMed ID: 4041712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of a prospective randomized trial of the Angelchik prosthesis and of a consecutive series of 119 patients.
    Eyre-Brook IA; Codling BW; Gear MW
    Br J Surg; 1993 May; 80(5):602-4. PubMed ID: 8518898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Long-term results.
    Kozarek RA; Brayko CM; Sanowski RA; Grobe JL; Phelps JE; Sarles H; Fredell CH
    Dig Dis Sci; 1985 Aug; 30(8):723-32. PubMed ID: 4017832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic removal of an Angelchik prosthesis.
    Underwood RA; Weinstock LB; Soper NJ; Quasebarth MA; Brunt LM
    Surg Endosc; 1999 Jun; 13(6):615-7. PubMed ID: 10347303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Angelchik prosthesis with oesophageal adenocarcinoma: our surgical approach.
    Shetty VD; Thrumurthy SG; Pursnani KG; Ward JB; Mughal MM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Jul; 92(5):W64-8. PubMed ID: 20626966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.