These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4017569)

  • 1. Sensitizing potential of 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate.
    Clemmensen S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Apr; 12(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 4017569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitizing potential of 14 mono (meth) acrylates in the guinea pig.
    van der Walle HB; Klecak G; Geleick H; Bensink T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1982 Jul; 8(4):223-35. PubMed ID: 7105684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The sensitizing potential of neopentyl methacrylate in the guinea pig.
    Waegemaekers TH; Seutter E
    Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Mar; 9(2):152. PubMed ID: 6851525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic compounds in the guinea pig.
    Björkner B; Niklasson B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):268-78. PubMed ID: 6525820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitization capacity of acrylated prepolymers in ultraviolet curing inks tested in the guinea pig.
    Björkner B
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1981; 61(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 6164222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structure-activity relationships for skin sensitisation potential of diacrylates and dimethacrylates.
    Roberts DW
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Nov; 17(5):281-9. PubMed ID: 3436133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute toxicity, subchronic dermal toxicity, and delayed contact sensitization evaluations of dicyclopentenyloxyethyl methacrylate in rabbits and guinea pigs.
    Chan PK; Baldwin RC; Fedorowski A; O'Hara GP; Hayes AW; Smith JM; Barthel CH
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1985; 16(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 4068055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitization potentials of methyl, ethyl, and n-butly methacrylates and mutual cross-sensitivity in guinea pigs.
    Chung CW; Giles AL
    J Invest Dermatol; 1977 Apr; 68(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 845451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sensitizing potential of di-(meth)acrylates based on bisphenol A or epoxy resin in the guinea pig.
    Bjorkner B; Niklasson B; Persson K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 May; 10(5):286-304. PubMed ID: 6234144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guinea pig maximization test, open epicutaneous test and chamber test in induction of delayed contact hypersensitivity.
    Kero M; Hannuksela M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Aug; 6(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 7418390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. I. Experimental contact sensitization in humans.
    Marzulli FN; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 1032125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tetraethylene glycol diacrylate. A cause of delayed cutaneous irritant reaction and allergic contact dermatitis.
    Nethercott JR; Gupta S; Rosen C; Enders LJ; Pilger CW
    J Occup Med; 1984 Jul; 26(7):513-6. PubMed ID: 6235332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitization capacity of polyester methacrylate in ultraviolet curing inks tested in the guinea pig.
    Björkner B
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1982; 62(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 6179340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1981 Nov; 42(11):B51-2. PubMed ID: 7315735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contact sensitivity to acrylate compounds in guinea pigs.
    Parker D; Turk JL
    Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Jan; 9(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 6839739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction of formaldehyde contact sensitivity: dose response relationship in the guinea pig maximization test.
    Andersen KE; Boman A; Vølund A; Wahlberg JE
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1985; 65(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 2420109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The sensitizing capacity of multifunctional acrylates in the guinea pig.
    Björkner B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Oct; 11(4):236-46. PubMed ID: 6499426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The sensitizing potential of 2-ethylhexyl acrylate in the guinea pig.
    Waegemaekers TH; van der Walle HB
    Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Sep; 9(5):372-6. PubMed ID: 6627921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How sensitizing is chlorocresol? Allergy tests in guinea pigs versus the clinical experience.
    Andersen KE; Hamann K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Jul; 11(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 6744837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cumulative irritancy in the guinea pig from low grade irritant vehicles and the angry skin syndrome.
    Andersen KE; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Oct; 6(6):430-4. PubMed ID: 7438742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.