These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4017569)

  • 21. Guinea pig allergy tests: an overview.
    Andersen KE; Maibach HI
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1985 Nov; 1(3):43-66. PubMed ID: 3916138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of vehicle on elicitation of DNCB contact allergy in the guinea pig.
    Christensen OB; Christensen MB; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Mar; 10(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 6713851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contact dermatitis and gastrointestinal symptoms from hydroxyethylmethacrylate.
    Mathias CG; Caldwell TM; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 1979 Apr; 100(4):447-9. PubMed ID: 156554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Guinea pig respiratory response to isocyanates.
    Mullin LS; Wood CK; Krivanek ND
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1983 Oct; 71(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 6195771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitizing potential of 12 di(meth)acrylates in the guinea pig.
    van der Walle HB; Waegemaekers T; Bensink T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Jan; 9(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 6839734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contact allergy to 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2-HPMA) in an ultraviolet curable ink.
    Björkner B
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1984; 64(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 6204493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Further studies of effects of vehicles and elicitation concentration in experimental contact sensitization testing in humans.
    Marzulli FN; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 7398265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. II. Statistical analysis of data.
    Atkinson JC; Rodi SB
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 1032126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Irritation and allergy to acrylates and methacrylates. - Part I: Common monoacrylates and monomethacrylates (author's transl)].
    Cavelier C; Jelen G; Hervé-Bazin B; Foussereau J
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1981; 108(6-7):549-56. PubMed ID: 6458228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experimental nickel sensitization in the guinea pig: comparison of different protocols.
    Lammintausta K; Kalimo K; Jansén CT
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 May; 12(5):258-62. PubMed ID: 4028701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of the guinea pig maximization protocol on the irritant response to deodorized kerosene - the excited skin syndrome.
    Nethercott JR; Lawrence M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1983 Nov; 9(6):439-43. PubMed ID: 6653100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitivity and subsequent "down regulation" of sensitivity induced by chlorocresol in guinea pigs.
    Andersen KE
    Arch Dermatol Res; 1985; 277(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 3985674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross-reaction patterns in guinea pigs sensitized to acrylic monomers.
    Clemmensen S
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1984; 7(6):527-40. PubMed ID: 6534730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Kathon biocide: manifestation of delayed contact dermatitis in guinea pigs is dependent on the concentration for induction and challenge.
    Chan PK; Baldwin RC; Parsons RD; Moss JN; Stiratelli R; Smith JM; Hayes AW
    J Invest Dermatol; 1983 Nov; 81(5):409-11. PubMed ID: 6631051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Guinea pig sensitization assays. An overview.
    Andersen KE; Maibach HI
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1985; 14():263-90. PubMed ID: 3905270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensitization studies in the guinea pig with the active ingredients of Euxyl K 400.
    Bruze M; Gruvberger B; Agrup G
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Jan; 18(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 3349777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Skin sensitization potential of allyl methacrylate in guinea pigs.
    Siddiqui WH; DeVries CR; Hobbs EJ
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1982; 5(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 7128478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Subchronic dermal toxicity study of allyl methacrylate in rabbits.
    Siddiqui WH; Hobbs EJ
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1982; 5(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 7128477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitization to yellow petrolatum used as a vehicle for patch testing.
    Dooms-Goossens A; Degreef H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):146-7. PubMed ID: 7398273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.