These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4019211)

  • 41. An overview of radiation safety regulatory recommendations and requirements.
    Balter S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Aug; 47(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 10470480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Some nonscientific influences on radiation protection standards and practice. The 1980 Sievert Lecture.
    Taylor LS
    Health Phys; 1980 Dec; 39(6):851-74. PubMed ID: 7204045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Radiation protection regulations in various countries (II) (author's transl)].
    Hamada T
    Radioisotopes; 1980 Aug; 29(8):409-15. PubMed ID: 7208999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
    Roy CR
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Australia's Radiation Protection Standards (1989).
    Klempfner G
    Australas Radiol; 1990 May; 34(2):100-1. PubMed ID: 2241658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Limits for intakes of radionuclides by workers. A report of Committee 2 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1981; 5(1-6):1-751. PubMed ID: 7469205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Standards for protection against radiation--Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1991 May; 56(98):23360-474. PubMed ID: 10111345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Draft recommendations for evaluation of radiation exposure in diagnostic radiology examinations.
    Burkhart RL; Gross RE; Jans RG; McCrohan JL; Reuter FG; Rosenstein M
    Radiol Manage; 1983 Sep; 5(4):34-41. PubMed ID: 10263551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The impact of the draft 2005 recommendations of ICRP on secondary derived regulatory values being considered by the US Department of Energy.
    O'Connell P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 16105895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Non-ionising electromagnetic environments on manned spacecraft.
    Murphy JR
    J Br Interplanet Soc; 1989 Aug; 42(7):383-90. PubMed ID: 11540234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Radiation protection regulations in various countries (III) (author's transl)].
    Hamada T
    Radioisotopes; 1980 Sep; 29(9):464-7. PubMed ID: 7221025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. New recommendations from the International Commission on Radiological Protection--a review.
    Wrixon AD
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(8):R41-60. PubMed ID: 18364557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Setting standards for laser radiation].
    Ushkova IN; Koshelev NF
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 1995; (11):32-4. PubMed ID: 8689074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Measurements of electromagnetic fields and evaluation of occupational exposure: PN-T-06580:2002 requirements and principles adopted in the European Union].
    Gryz K; Karpowicz J
    Med Pr; 2003; 54(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 14669582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
    Charles MW
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Implications of ICRP 60 and the patient directive 97/43 Euratom for nuclear medicine.
    Bourguignon MH
    Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Dec; 44(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 11302257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Hygienic standardization of the biological action of non-ionizing radiation according to an immunologic criterion of hazardousness].
    Batanov GV; Trifonov SI
    Gig Sanit; 1984 Jul; (7):52-6. PubMed ID: 6383958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Trends in retinal damage thresholds from 100-millisecond near-infrared laser radiation exposures: a study at 1,110, 1,130, 1,150, and 1,319 nm.
    Vincelette RL; Rockwell BA; Oliver JW; Kumru SS; Thomas RJ; Schuster KJ; Noojin GD; Shingledecker AD; Stolarski DJ; Welch AJ
    Lasers Surg Med; 2009 Jul; 41(5):382-90. PubMed ID: 19533764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The problems of radiation double standards: exposure of potentially pregnant persons.
    Taylor LS
    Health Phys; 1985 Dec; 49(6):1043-52. PubMed ID: 4077510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Discrepancies in guidelines for exposure limits around 300 GHz.
    van Rongen E
    Health Phys; 1998 Oct; 75(4):436-7. PubMed ID: 9753371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.