These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4020322)

  • 41. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 17343994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Failure to find a distance effect in pigeon choice: Manipulating amount and delay of reinforcement.
    Sanabria F; Bell MC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Nov; 114(3):276-290. PubMed ID: 33034054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.
    Mazur JE; Vaughan W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 3681185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Testing the Δ-∑ hypothesis in the suboptimal choice task: Same delta with different probabilities of reinforcement.
    González VV; Macías A; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Sep; 114(2):233-247. PubMed ID: 33460139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effects of changeover delays on local choice.
    Gomes-Ng S; Landon J; Elliffe D; Bensemann J; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.
    da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):395-413. PubMed ID: 21119853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Animal procrastination: Pigeons choose to defer experiencing an aversive gap or a peck requirement.
    Zentall TR; Peng D; House D; Halloran M
    Learn Behav; 2020 Jun; 48(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 31845110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Procrastination by pigeons: preference for larger, more delayed work requirements.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jan; 65(1):159-71. PubMed ID: 8583195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pigeons' discounting of probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
    Green L; Myerson J; Calvert AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 21451742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of rate of reinforcement and rate of change on choice behaviour in transition.
    Mazur JE
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 May; 50(2):111-28. PubMed ID: 9225619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.
    Sargisson RJ; White KG
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 17918423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rats' choices between one and two delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 17918422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Response factors in delay discounting: evidence for Pavlovian influences on delay discounting in pigeons.
    Holt DD; Carlson JD; Follett VL; Jerdee NJ; Kelley DP; Muhich KM; Tiry AM; Reetz NK
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():37-43. PubMed ID: 23618788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Choice as a function of reinforcer "hold": from probability learning to concurrent reinforcement.
    Jensen G; Neuringer A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Oct; 34(4):437-60. PubMed ID: 18954229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Acquisition of choice in concurrent chains: Assessing the cumulative decision model.
    Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2016 May; 126():82-93. PubMed ID: 27005579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.
    McCarthy DC; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1940763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
    Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.