317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4022077)
1. Journal peer review.
N Engl J Med; 1985 Aug; 313(7):455-6. PubMed ID: 4022077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Our peer-review practice and strategies to improve journal scientific performance].
Kudaiberdieva G
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2010 Oct; 10(5):389-90. PubMed ID: 20929692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reviewer status and review quality. Experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Stossel TP
N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):658-9. PubMed ID: 3974642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.
Gelenberg AJ
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599. PubMed ID: 20031101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Politics and peer review.
Magnus D
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 15035920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Support for peer review.
Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The process of a peer-reviewed journal.
Pearson GS
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2013 Jul; 49(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 23819663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Perfecting peer review?
Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
Kulstad E
PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability.
Green SM; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):149-152.e4. PubMed ID: 20947204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review in early career: just say yes!
Roy-Byrne PP
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1602-3. PubMed ID: 20031104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Strengthening the peer review process for the International Journal of Toxicology.
Brock WJ
Int J Toxicol; 2014; 33(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 25436270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers.
Callaham M; McCulloch C
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 21074894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The discourteous reviewer.
Leviton A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Conflict of interest and respiratory care.
Pierson DJ
Respir Care; 2000 Apr; 45(4):388-9. PubMed ID: 10780033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What can CCR do for you?
Potash J; Anderson KC
Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Aug; 16(16):4069-70. PubMed ID: 20682715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
