These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4022649)

  • 1. The effect of illumination and foveal fusion lock on clinical fixation disparity measurements with the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Wildsoet CF; Cameron KD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 4022649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.
    Goss DA; Patel J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):580-8. PubMed ID: 8539027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
    Brownlee GA; Goss DA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity with and without a central fusion stimulus.
    Brautaset RL; Jennings JA
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Feb; 12(2):MT1-4. PubMed ID: 16449958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the presence of a central fusion lock effect on fixation disparity curve parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Mirzaeian M; Hashemi H; Narooie-Noori F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Sardari S; Ostadimoghaddam H; Doostdar A; Khabazkhoob M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 33751916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agreement of Fixation Disparity Curve between Two Different Instruments.
    Hashemi H; Mirzaeian M; Narooie F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Sardari S; Khabazkhoob M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jun; 98(6):629-635. PubMed ID: 34081653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical fusion frequency in the central visual field.
    Douthwaite WA; Halliwell JA; Lomas AM; Yan Muk WK; Topliss JN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 3975041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of fixation disparity measured by saladin card and disparometer.
    Frantz KA; Elston P; Michalik E; Templeman CD; Zoltoski RK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 88(6):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21423065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve with the modified near Mallett unit and the wesson fixation disparity card in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta AA; Ehsani M; Kundart J
    Strabismus; 2012 Dec; 20(4):166-74. PubMed ID: 23211142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Wesson and modified Sheedy fixation disparity tests. Do fixation disparity measures relate to normal binocular status?
    van Haeringen R; McClurg P; Cameron KD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 3627800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative clinical studies on foveal and peripheral optokinetic nystagmus.
    Lang J; Csapody I
    Int J Equilib Res; 1973 Jun; 3(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 4807554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The fixation disparity-heterophoria relationship.
    McCullough RW
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1978 Apr; 49(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 649916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonselective losses in foveal chromatic and luminance sensitivity in multiple sclerosis.
    Foster DH; Snelgar RS; Heron JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Oct; 26(10):1431-41. PubMed ID: 4044171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual consequences of the foveal pit.
    Williams DR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Jun; 19(6):653-67. PubMed ID: 7380624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The prism that aligns fixation disparity does not predict the self-selected prism.
    Otto JM; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Nov; 28(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19076557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertical fixation disparity correction: effect on the horizontal forced-vergence fixation disparity curve.
    London RF; Wick B
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Sep; 64(9):653-6. PubMed ID: 3688184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between fixation disparity curves and symptoms in monofixators.
    London R; Wick B
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Nov; 53(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7175062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fixation disparity in binocular stress.
    Pickwell LD; Jenkins TC; Yetka AA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 3658422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect on fixation disparity and associated heterophoria of reading at an abnormally close distance.
    Pickwell D; Jenkins T; Yekta AA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 3454908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.