These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4022862)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of the Infrasonde D4000 blood pressure monitor.
    Zezulka AV; Sloan PJ; Davies P; Beevers DG
    Postgrad Med J; 1985 Apr; 61(714):321-3. PubMed ID: 4022862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation and comparison of the Infrasonde, Arteriosonde, and mercury sphygmomanometer in measurement of blood pressure in children.
    Savage JM; Dillon MJ; Taylor JF
    Arch Dis Child; 1979 Mar; 54(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 434903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer as a gold standard may result in misleading conclusions.
    Conroy RM; Atkins N; Mee F; O'Brien E; O'Malley K
    Blood Press; 1994 Sep; 3(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 7866591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardized methods for comparison of sphygmomanometers.
    Sloan PJ; Zezulka A; Davies P; Sangal A; Beevers M; Beevers DG
    J Hypertens; 1984 Oct; 2(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 6530556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of Dinamap 845 automated blood pressure recorder.
    Silas JH; Barker AT; Ramsay LE
    Br Heart J; 1980 Feb; 43(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 7362713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of the Nippon Colin BP-103N blood pressure monitor.
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    J Hum Hypertens; 1987 Jun; 1(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 3508193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a new portable electronic sphygmomanometer (Copal UA251) with the Hawksley random zero machine.
    Malatino LS; Brown WC
    Clin Exp Hypertens A; 1988; 10(4):589-96. PubMed ID: 3390962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
    Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.
    Whincup PH; Bruce NG; Cook DG; Shaper AG
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Apr; 46(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 1583434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings.
    Hunyor SN; Flynn JM; Cochineas C
    Br Med J; 1978 Jul; 2(6131):159-62. PubMed ID: 678830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
    Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Parker D; Liu K; Dyer AR; Giumetti D; Liao YL; Stamler J
    Hypertension; 1988 Mar; 11(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 3280484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons of blood pressure measurements by auscultation and Physiometrics Infrasonde recording techniques.
    van den Berg BJ
    Hypertension; 1980; 2(4 Pt 2):I8-17. PubMed ID: 7399640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer versus the standard sphygmomanometer: an investigation of mechanisms.
    Kinirons MT; Maskrey VL; Lawson M; Swift CG; Jackson SH
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Jul; 9(7):571-3. PubMed ID: 7562887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of an automatic sphygmomanometer].
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    Sb Lek; 1989 Sep; 91(8):274-84. PubMed ID: 2617128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
    Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field evaluation of the Copal UA-231 automatic sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers S; Smith GD; Doyle W
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1988 Dec; 42(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 3256572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the DINAMAP blood pressure monitor in an ambulatory primary care setting.
    Ornstein S; Markert G; Litchfield L; Zemp L
    J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 3367116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of automated blood pressure recorders.
    Rubin P; McLean K; Reid J
    Postgrad Med J; 1980 Dec; 56(662):815-7. PubMed ID: 7267490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.