These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4022862)

  • 21. Evaluation of the arterial blood pressure of dogs by two noninvasive methods.
    Chalifoux A; Dallaire A; Blais D; Larivière N; Pelletier N
    Can J Comp Med; 1985 Oct; 49(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 4075242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation.
    Stewart MJ; Gough K; Padfield PL
    J Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 13(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 7622850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the Vita-Stat automatic blood pressure recorder. A comparison with the Random-Zero sphygmomanometer.
    Whelton PK; Thompson SG; Barnes GR; Miall WE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1983 Jan; 117(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 6823952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of the sphygmomat 2 semi-automatic blood pressure monitor.
    Prior AJ; Peck K; Davies P; Beevers DG
    J Med Eng Technol; 1990; 14(6):250-3. PubMed ID: 2283674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Blood pressure measurement in children: the importance of cuff bladder size.
    Whincup PH; Cook DG; Shaper AG
    J Hypertens; 1989 Oct; 7(10):845-50. PubMed ID: 2584699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the Sphygmetrics SR-2 Automatic Blood Pressure Recorder to the mercury sphygmomanometer in population studies.
    Fortmann SP; Marcuson R; Bitter PH; Haskell WL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1981 Dec; 114(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 7315832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluation of the Copal UA-251 and the Dinamap 1848 automatic blood-pressure monitors.
    Maheswaran R; Zezulka AV; Gill JS; Beevers M; Davies P; Beevers DG
    J Med Eng Technol; 1988; 12(4):160-3. PubMed ID: 3193436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of two automatic blood pressure recorders and the mercury sphygomomanometer.
    Voors AW; Sklov MC; Halperin H; Webber LS; Berenson GS
    Hypertension; 1982; 4(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 7068191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A community-based evaluation of the Vita-Stat automatic blood pressure recorder.
    Salaita K; Whelton PK; Seidler AJ
    Am J Hypertens; 1990 May; 3(5 Pt 1):366-72. PubMed ID: 2350476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
    Heinemann M; Sellick K; Rickard C; Reynolds P; McGrail M
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2008 Aug; 14(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18715391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automatic measurement of blood pressure: evaluation of the Copal UA-231 automatic sphygmomanometer.
    Gallacher JE; Yarnell JW; Rogers S; Sweetnam P
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1985 Sep; 39(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 4045362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical experience with use of ultrasound sphygmomanometer.
    George CF; Lewis PJ; Petrie A
    Br Heart J; 1975 Aug; 37(8):804-7. PubMed ID: 1103909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Potential problems with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.
    Birkett NJ
    Hypertension; 1994 Feb; 23(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 8307636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automated blood pressure measurement in routine clinical practice.
    Myers MG
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 16534406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the use of a semiautomated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer in the hypertension clinic.
    Prasad N; Wheeldon NM; MacDonald TM
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(6):307-9. PubMed ID: 7848794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A clinical evaluation of the Accutracker--a lightweight ambulatory blood pressure monitor.
    Phillips DI; Braithwaite J; Newcombe RG; Lazarus JH
    J Hum Hypertens; 1989 Dec; 3(6):463-5. PubMed ID: 2607520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.